is ridiculous. If their coal is really so clean, why are they so opposed to emissions caps? CCS is not a viable long-term solution, it just shunts the problem on for someone else to deal with.

greenpictures.wordpress.com

...deafeat the coal plants one by one, that way, no matter the hurdles they try to throw at legislation, they'll still fail.

Sure, ACCCE should be grateful that the bill concedes a bit to their industry. And this is how I see us  getting through  the future.
Stage 1: While museums, commercial, coporate, & public buildings, and houses should find out how to fix solar panels on their roofs, condominium-owners & house owners (and the former as well) should wean themselves of power by using energy-savers,like Flourescent Bulbs, hybrids, public transport.
Stage 2: Convert completely to solar, wind, & hydro
Lieberman-Warner should be enacted. But we'll need Clean Coal, and some nuclear, to carry us through the first stage.  After all, It's how much Co2, not what energy

NO COAL. Period.
Get rid of it all.
Warner-Lieberman not excepted or accepted.
Want clean coal?
Bury it in the earth with newcular.
Any other brite ideas?