<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Taking a three-day weekend for the planet]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by vakibs</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-prophetic-approach-to-energy-efficiency/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 21:42:20 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-prophetic-approach-to-energy-efficiency/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Not much to do with energy savings</strong></p><p>Huntsman says the change will help Utah reach its goal of reducing energy use 20% by 2015.</p><p>
How can reducing commutes by 20% reduce energy use by 20%, when you estimate that commutes account for 30% of total energy use ? </p><p>
A more reasonable number would be 6%. </p><p>
But even this is doubtful since most people don't stay home on holidays. (And of course, they keey running A/C if &nbsp;they are at home). </p><p>
I agree that this move brings a smile onto the face of many employees, but the reasons have very little to do with environment, I am afraid. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Not much to do with energy savings</strong></p><p>Huntsman says the change will help Utah reach its goal of reducing energy use 20% by 2015.</p><p>
How can reducing commutes by 20% reduce energy use by 20%, when you estimate that commutes account for 30% of total energy use ? </p><p>
A more reasonable number would be 6%. </p><p>
But even this is doubtful since most people don't stay home on holidays. (And of course, they keey running A/C if &nbsp;they are at home). </p><p>
I agree that this move brings a smile onto the face of many employees, but the reasons have very little to do with environment, I am afraid. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Eric de Place</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-prophetic-approach-to-energy-efficiency/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:54:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-prophetic-approach-to-energy-efficiency/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sure it does</strong></p><p>vakibs,</p><p>
I think you're being a little unfair. Huntsman said it would <b>help</b> reach the 20% goal. And I think it pretty clearly does help. </p><p>
Obviously, Utah will need more tools in it's energy efficiency toolbox, but there are some really good indications so far. For one thing, Utah's joined the Western Climate Initiatve -- which means at least an executive-level commitment to carbon cap &amp; trade. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Sure it does</strong></p><p>vakibs,</p><p>
I think you're being a little unfair. Huntsman said it would <b>help</b> reach the 20% goal. And I think it pretty clearly does help. </p><p>
Obviously, Utah will need more tools in it's energy efficiency toolbox, but there are some really good indications so far. For one thing, Utah's joined the Western Climate Initiatve -- which means at least an executive-level commitment to carbon cap &amp; trade. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>