<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Wherein I finally get it all out]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sunflower</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:03:39 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hippie Greenie</strong></p><p>As I recall, the Hippies disbanded in 1967. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Hippie Greenie</strong></p><p>As I recall, the Hippies disbanded in 1967. &nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by jjwfmme</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:25:49 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Too True.<p>I completely agree. A lot of this is about having some spine and standing up to these blustering idiots... It seems like something has happened with movement conservatism and cable news. Somehow they've been able to dictate whole cloth what is and is not respectable. And they still do, just look at the yakkers on TV. This is a problem.<p>
And as you say it's ongoing. If you look at recent history, they should be the ones who aren't respectable. The recent war has been a prime example. The whole war effort was practically an empty shell as far as planning goes. If you read any of the books about it-- George Packer's Assassin's Gate, or Ricks' Fiasco. The whole thing was, as you said, a complete clusterfuck. It's really quite shocking when your read the books. And the media went along for the ride. (I know the MSM thinks us bloggers are so rude for swearing blah blah blah, but whatever.)<p>
So there was no sane planning, but of course there was a phalanx of PR and media. I think this mirrors what we're seeing on other issues, including our own. &nbsp;<p>
My feeling is that people have had enough and that's what the recent elections were about. I think Sidney Blumenthal <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2006/11/08/election/" rel="nofollow">in this Salon essay got it right. (I've also been spreading around this <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/12/18/suskind_empiricism.html" rel="nofollow">Jay Rosen post, which I think says a lot about the way the media has been sleepwalking through all this...)</a></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Too True.<p>I completely agree. A lot of this is about having some spine and standing up to these blustering idiots... It seems like something has happened with movement conservatism and cable news. Somehow they've been able to dictate whole cloth what is and is not respectable. And they still do, just look at the yakkers on TV. This is a problem.<p>
And as you say it's ongoing. If you look at recent history, they should be the ones who aren't respectable. The recent war has been a prime example. The whole war effort was practically an empty shell as far as planning goes. If you read any of the books about it-- George Packer's Assassin's Gate, or Ricks' Fiasco. The whole thing was, as you said, a complete clusterfuck. It's really quite shocking when your read the books. And the media went along for the ride. (I know the MSM thinks us bloggers are so rude for swearing blah blah blah, but whatever.)<p>
So there was no sane planning, but of course there was a phalanx of PR and media. I think this mirrors what we're seeing on other issues, including our own. &nbsp;<p>
My feeling is that people have had enough and that's what the recent elections were about. I think Sidney Blumenthal <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2006/11/08/election/" rel="nofollow">in this Salon essay got it right. (I've also been spreading around this <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2006/12/18/suskind_empiricism.html" rel="nofollow">Jay Rosen post, which I think says a lot about the way the media has been sleepwalking through all this...)</a></a></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by jjwfmme</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:42:27 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>And just to be clear</strong></p><p>I think the idea of invading a country smack in the middle of the middle east was exactly what it looked like at first glance. Insane. But if you disagree, at least you should have, um, a plan?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>And just to be clear</strong></p><p>I think the idea of invading a country smack in the middle of the middle east was exactly what it looked like at first glance. Insane. But if you disagree, at least you should have, um, a plan?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by markbahner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah, Kucinich and Paul...two dirty hippies<p>"The dirty hippies -- the great masses of the public and the very few public figures (Feingold, Gore, Kucinich)..."<p>
Yeah, dirty hippies! &nbsp;Like Ron Paul:<p>
<a href="http://www.ronpaul.net/assets/images/ronpaulphoto.jpg" rel="nofollow">(In)famous dirty hippie<p>
<a href="http://www.house.gov/paul/" rel="nofollow">Ron Paul, dirty hippie

<p>Mark Bahner</p></a></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Yeah, Kucinich and Paul...two dirty hippies<p>"The dirty hippies -- the great masses of the public and the very few public figures (Feingold, Gore, Kucinich)..."<p>
Yeah, dirty hippies! &nbsp;Like Ron Paul:<p>
<a href="http://www.ronpaul.net/assets/images/ronpaulphoto.jpg" rel="nofollow">(In)famous dirty hippie<p>
<a href="http://www.house.gov/paul/" rel="nofollow">Ron Paul, dirty hippie

<p>Mark Bahner</p></a></p></a></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by willa</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:44:02 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well, at least we're all dirty together...</strong></p><p>What liberal media? &nbsp;They tell me there's a liberal media, but it sure doesn't seem like it to me.</p><p>
I love this post, David. &nbsp;I hope it makes you feel at least a little better to have written it. :)</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Well, at least we're all dirty together...</strong></p><p>What liberal media? &nbsp;They tell me there's a liberal media, but it sure doesn't seem like it to me.</p><p>
I love this post, David. &nbsp;I hope it makes you feel at least a little better to have written it. :)</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by caniscandida</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:03:42 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the good Doctor from Vermont</strong></p><p>In the admirable anti-war company of Russ Feingold, Al Gore and Dennis Kucinich, we must certainly remember to include dear Howard Dean, who went furthest with his call for an end to the occupation, and whom Gore endorsed. &nbsp;Notice that after he peaked and began to slip, the media cruelly and falsifyingly manipulated the notorious Scream speech, so that all America could agree -- to the relief of the mainstream Democrats -- that Dean was obviously an unacceptable wild man (not quite the same as a "dirty hippie," but close kin). &nbsp;(Ironically, Vermonters remember him as being very centrist as a governor, with many people to his left -- not unlike Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco.) &nbsp;Even now he continues to receive the enmity of Rahm Emanuel, Chuck Schumer and James Carville, although his fa-sighted 50-state strategy had a lot to do with the happy outcome of last November's elections, and perhaps will be fundamental to retaining the majority, and winning the White House, in 2008.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>the good Doctor from Vermont</strong></p><p>In the admirable anti-war company of Russ Feingold, Al Gore and Dennis Kucinich, we must certainly remember to include dear Howard Dean, who went furthest with his call for an end to the occupation, and whom Gore endorsed. &nbsp;Notice that after he peaked and began to slip, the media cruelly and falsifyingly manipulated the notorious Scream speech, so that all America could agree -- to the relief of the mainstream Democrats -- that Dean was obviously an unacceptable wild man (not quite the same as a "dirty hippie," but close kin). &nbsp;(Ironically, Vermonters remember him as being very centrist as a governor, with many people to his left -- not unlike Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco.) &nbsp;Even now he continues to receive the enmity of Rahm Emanuel, Chuck Schumer and James Carville, although his fa-sighted 50-state strategy had a lot to do with the happy outcome of last November's elections, and perhaps will be fundamental to retaining the majority, and winning the White House, in 2008.

<p>Chickens are our cousins!
So are other sensitive animals!
Enough is enough!
No more factory farms!</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by bookerly</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:36:18 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ooo!  Ooo!  Where Where!!</strong></p><p><br>
&nbsp; Wow, those dirty hippies sound like more fun than killing Iraqi school children!! &nbsp;Where can I find some?? &nbsp;(grin).</p><p>
&nbsp; Nice post, and entirely accurate. &nbsp;We have allowed the morons who scream the loudest to frame the debate and destroy most attempts at reasonable discourse. &nbsp;From the Al Gore internet robot man to &nbsp;the John Kerry Swift Boat Francophile, we have let them demonize everyone and anyone who disagrees.</p><p>
&nbsp; Ironically, they don't get it. &nbsp;They think this is all good clean fun, and part of some stupid game they are winning. &nbsp;</p><p>
&nbsp; Listen to Rush claim that he has never made any personal attacks on any Democrats, and understand that he REALLY believes this. &nbsp;Scary.</p><p>
&nbsp; (I will quibble with the list of people you say are on the left. But not with the general idea.)</p><p>
&nbsp; It is an old tactic, pick those whom &nbsp;you want to represent the opponents positions, and use them as the spokespeople of the opposition. &nbsp;Here are my nominees. &nbsp;I want Rev. Al Sharpton to be the official spokesperson for Christianity (he is because I say he is), Jim Hightower can speak for Southerners along with Molly Ivins, Abraham Lincoln speaks for Republicans (oh, he is dead, well, we'll find them someone else to represent them in another century or two), David Roberts can represent conservatives (I swear he is to the right of me!), and CanisCandida can speak for intellectuals (no on is better). &nbsp;And so on...</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;Gee, what an interesting debate we would have if this was what our Sunday Panel shows looked like!</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;The mass media in America is dominated by an insane (and not too bright) oilagarchy which seems to feel that as long as Americans have beer, bikinis and football, not much else is neccessary.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;Oh, burn a dirty hippie at the stake once in a while.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;An American teacher I know (who is much more conservative than I am) despairs that America is destroying itself.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;I have been considering changing my nic to Cassandra.</p><p>
patrick</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ooo!  Ooo!  Where Where!!</strong></p><p><br>
&nbsp; Wow, those dirty hippies sound like more fun than killing Iraqi school children!! &nbsp;Where can I find some?? &nbsp;(grin).</p><p>
&nbsp; Nice post, and entirely accurate. &nbsp;We have allowed the morons who scream the loudest to frame the debate and destroy most attempts at reasonable discourse. &nbsp;From the Al Gore internet robot man to &nbsp;the John Kerry Swift Boat Francophile, we have let them demonize everyone and anyone who disagrees.</p><p>
&nbsp; Ironically, they don't get it. &nbsp;They think this is all good clean fun, and part of some stupid game they are winning. &nbsp;</p><p>
&nbsp; Listen to Rush claim that he has never made any personal attacks on any Democrats, and understand that he REALLY believes this. &nbsp;Scary.</p><p>
&nbsp; (I will quibble with the list of people you say are on the left. But not with the general idea.)</p><p>
&nbsp; It is an old tactic, pick those whom &nbsp;you want to represent the opponents positions, and use them as the spokespeople of the opposition. &nbsp;Here are my nominees. &nbsp;I want Rev. Al Sharpton to be the official spokesperson for Christianity (he is because I say he is), Jim Hightower can speak for Southerners along with Molly Ivins, Abraham Lincoln speaks for Republicans (oh, he is dead, well, we'll find them someone else to represent them in another century or two), David Roberts can represent conservatives (I swear he is to the right of me!), and CanisCandida can speak for intellectuals (no on is better). &nbsp;And so on...</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;Gee, what an interesting debate we would have if this was what our Sunday Panel shows looked like!</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;The mass media in America is dominated by an insane (and not too bright) oilagarchy which seems to feel that as long as Americans have beer, bikinis and football, not much else is neccessary.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;Oh, burn a dirty hippie at the stake once in a while.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;An American teacher I know (who is much more conservative than I am) despairs that America is destroying itself.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;I have been considering changing my nic to Cassandra.</p><p>
patrick</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by Professor H</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:45:43 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Nice points</strong></p><p>If a bit hysterically made. I admit to being rather puzzled about the article, since I never really saw how he got off calling that stance a "middle."</p><p>
BTW, same effect is seen with feminism; people are only too happy to point out that they're not feminists.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Nice points</strong></p><p>If a bit hysterically made. I admit to being rather puzzled about the article, since I never really saw how he got off calling that stance a "middle."</p><p>
BTW, same effect is seen with feminism; people are only too happy to point out that they're not feminists.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #9 by jjwfmme</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:03:20 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/9</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Juan Williams<p>If a bit hysterically made.<p>
Us and <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/10/juan-williams-scream/" rel="nofollow">Juan Williams on Fox News: <p>
Sometimes I just want to scream. You guys have been going on since this thing began. I mean, you don't give credit to people, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Barbara Lee, people who said from the start this is a mistake...<p>
&nbsp;</p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Juan Williams<p>If a bit hysterically made.<p>
Us and <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2006/12/10/juan-williams-scream/" rel="nofollow">Juan Williams on Fox News: <p>
Sometimes I just want to scream. You guys have been going on since this thing began. I mean, you don't give credit to people, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Barbara Lee, people who said from the start this is a mistake...<p>
&nbsp;</p></p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #10 by froggy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/10</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>jesus and St Francis</strong></p><p>ill bet jesus and St Francis both would be considered a tree hugging dirty hippy freak in todays world.</p><p>
i dont get people...

<p>froggy</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>jesus and St Francis</strong></p><p>ill bet jesus and St Francis both would be considered a tree hugging dirty hippy freak in todays world.</p><p>
i dont get people...

<p>froggy</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #11 by Adam Browning</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:39:34 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/11</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>whew<p>that was cathartic even vicariously.

<p>Get Some Sun: <a href="http://www.votesolar.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.votesolar.org</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>whew<p>that was cathartic even vicariously.

<p>Get Some Sun: <a href="http://www.votesolar.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.votesolar.org</a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #12 by jjwfmme</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:01:24 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/12</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Media/culture wars suggested reading...<p>By the way, some suggested reading on the culture wars: Richard Hofstadter's classic, <a href="http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theory/the_paranoid_mentality/the_paranoid_style.html" rel="nofollow">The Paranoid Style of American Politics, and Jay Rosen's update, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2003/10/21/oreilly_voice.html" rel="nofollow">Bill O'Reilly and the Paranoid Style in News. Then David Brock's essay, "<a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/books/feature/2004/05/12/tv/index.html" rel="nofollow">The right captures the tube" on the subject of the Mclaughlin Group (which I found really interesting). If you really want to get deep into it, read David Brock's whole <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Republican-Noise-Machine-Right-Wing-Democracy/dp/1400048753" rel="nofollow">The Republican Noise Machine. It's a bit too long on the details, and sometimes it reads too much like a screed for my tastes, but it really does capture the whole "whoever makes the most noise wins" scene pretty effectively... </a></a></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Media/culture wars suggested reading...<p>By the way, some suggested reading on the culture wars: Richard Hofstadter's classic, <a href="http://karws.gso.uri.edu/jfk/conspiracy_theory/the_paranoid_mentality/the_paranoid_style.html" rel="nofollow">The Paranoid Style of American Politics, and Jay Rosen's update, <a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2003/10/21/oreilly_voice.html" rel="nofollow">Bill O'Reilly and the Paranoid Style in News. Then David Brock's essay, "<a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/books/feature/2004/05/12/tv/index.html" rel="nofollow">The right captures the tube" on the subject of the Mclaughlin Group (which I found really interesting). If you really want to get deep into it, read David Brock's whole <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Republican-Noise-Machine-Right-Wing-Democracy/dp/1400048753" rel="nofollow">The Republican Noise Machine. It's a bit too long on the details, and sometimes it reads too much like a screed for my tastes, but it really does capture the whole "whoever makes the most noise wins" scene pretty effectively... </a></a></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #13 by apsmith</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:15:09 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/13</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Exactly!</strong></p><p>David, I bow down before your wonderful rant! Even though I thought Revkin's article was ok... :-) So - how do we fix this?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Exactly!</strong></p><p>David, I bow down before your wonderful rant! Even though I thought Revkin's article was ok... :-) So - how do we fix this?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #14 by PPLE</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:21:58 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/14</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>It's not about war or the environment, it is about<p>ECONOMICS. There is no left without anti-capitalist economic. All there is absent that discussion is a menu of lifestyle choices masquerading as politics.<p>
To Wit:<p>
The Gaia Hypothesis is anything but New Age: Gaia describes a universe in which individuals are twigs on an exquisitely branchy tree, implicitly therefore with a consciousness (though the Gaia Hypothesis does not address this question) that is but the pinpoint of the greater tree-consciousness -- or as our pagan ancestors believed, the extended consciousness of our mother the goddess focused to an infinity of individual pinpoints whether inanimate or animate: Ed Sander's "tiny sparks of the universe." Hence Taliesin's "there is nothing in which I have not been"; hence too the formidable logic behind the central chant of the Ghost Dance: "we shall live again." And -- if I may return once more to the analogy of the branchy tree -- beyond this there is the greater community of treeness, what Gary Snyder aptly calls "Earth Household," the implicitly socialist, implicitly communalist realm of being that was instinctively recognized by most of humanity throughout most of its history -- that is, until the advent of patriarchy spawned the absolutism of Abrahamic separatism which in turn produced capitalism and is now predictably metastasizing into fascism: its ultimate form -- of which New Age is a vital support-element.<p>
Indeed New Age is the diametrical opposite of Gaian community and solidarity. New Age is the quintessence of existential isolationism, the ultimate (and ultimately selfish) exclamation of the fascist concept of ubermenschen und untermenschen, man and superman -- and thus absolute self-centeredness rationalized as maximum virtue -- in exactly the same way capitalism is absolute greed rationalized as maximum virtue.<p>
To enlarge slightly on something I recently wrote (in a New-Age-infested venue from which I was ousted for daring to express these very observations): never mind that the core of New Age doctrine is a fuck-you-I-am-god belief that can only further defiance of the environmental mandates of Earth Household; the fascism implicit in the New Age credo lies in the fact that -- even more than the doctrines of Abrahamic religion (which divide all the word into the ubermenschen of the "saved" and the untermenschen of the "damned") -- the mind-over-matter dogma of the New Age cleaves humanity into the "evolved souls" of the "fully conscious" or "enlightened" elite (those "spiritually progressed beings" -- hence "progressives" -- allegedly able to control their own fates merely by the power of their own thoughts), and the dunce-cap proletariat of the "un-evolved" masses, (all the rest of us who for whatever reason refuse to accept the New Age gospel). And just as the Christians elevate wealth to proof of divine favor, denounce the poor as "sinners" and rail that our poverty is proof of our "sin," so do the New Agers exalt riches as proof of enlightenment, dismiss poverty as nothing more than a "self-destructive lifestyle choice" and sneer at us poor as "hopelessly un-evolved." In either case, what is deftly ignored is the fact that capitalism is a slave ideology -- a giant pyramid scam fueled by the ever-worsening survival struggles of an ever-expanding underclass increasingly condemned to inescapable wretchedness.<p>
Thus we see the true function of New Age dogma: to replace the dying dogmas of Abrahamic religion and thereby reinforce the genuinely Nazi ethos at the core of capitalism. Just as Christian capitalists relentlessly savage their workers but find reassurance of their righteousness in church on Sunday, so now New Age executives do likewise in the privacy of their own posh dwellings: they chant some self-affirming mantra and assure themselves of their superiority merely by believing they can "visualize peace." Thus too the so-called New Age is merely the latest attempt to rationalize capitalism -- the most ecocidally parasitic, genocidally selfish ethos in human experience -- a fact proven beyond a scintilla of doubt by the huge corporate beneficence that finances the propagation of New Age beliefs. By contrast, the Gaia Hypothesis is positively subversive: it is the missing link that harmonizes ecology with socialism and -- by implication -- bonds spirituality and science in a mutually supportive manner unknown since the rise of patriarchy. It does all this because it brings us back, via science, to the ecological interdependence of all being -- the ancient knowledge that if one part of Earth Household becomes so predatory it jeopardizes the whole, the entirety of the household is programmed to rise against it and kill it: precisely the self-inflicted apocalypse we now euphemistically describe as global warming. To which adherents of the New Age -- defiantly self-centered to the pollution-bitter end -- will no doubt respond with yet another bumper-sticker: "visualize global cooling." <br>
<a href="http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/blup.cgi?entry_id=210748" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/blup.cgi?entry_id=210748</a></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>It's not about war or the environment, it is about<p>ECONOMICS. There is no left without anti-capitalist economic. All there is absent that discussion is a menu of lifestyle choices masquerading as politics.<p>
To Wit:<p>
The Gaia Hypothesis is anything but New Age: Gaia describes a universe in which individuals are twigs on an exquisitely branchy tree, implicitly therefore with a consciousness (though the Gaia Hypothesis does not address this question) that is but the pinpoint of the greater tree-consciousness -- or as our pagan ancestors believed, the extended consciousness of our mother the goddess focused to an infinity of individual pinpoints whether inanimate or animate: Ed Sander's "tiny sparks of the universe." Hence Taliesin's "there is nothing in which I have not been"; hence too the formidable logic behind the central chant of the Ghost Dance: "we shall live again." And -- if I may return once more to the analogy of the branchy tree -- beyond this there is the greater community of treeness, what Gary Snyder aptly calls "Earth Household," the implicitly socialist, implicitly communalist realm of being that was instinctively recognized by most of humanity throughout most of its history -- that is, until the advent of patriarchy spawned the absolutism of Abrahamic separatism which in turn produced capitalism and is now predictably metastasizing into fascism: its ultimate form -- of which New Age is a vital support-element.<p>
Indeed New Age is the diametrical opposite of Gaian community and solidarity. New Age is the quintessence of existential isolationism, the ultimate (and ultimately selfish) exclamation of the fascist concept of ubermenschen und untermenschen, man and superman -- and thus absolute self-centeredness rationalized as maximum virtue -- in exactly the same way capitalism is absolute greed rationalized as maximum virtue.<p>
To enlarge slightly on something I recently wrote (in a New-Age-infested venue from which I was ousted for daring to express these very observations): never mind that the core of New Age doctrine is a fuck-you-I-am-god belief that can only further defiance of the environmental mandates of Earth Household; the fascism implicit in the New Age credo lies in the fact that -- even more than the doctrines of Abrahamic religion (which divide all the word into the ubermenschen of the "saved" and the untermenschen of the "damned") -- the mind-over-matter dogma of the New Age cleaves humanity into the "evolved souls" of the "fully conscious" or "enlightened" elite (those "spiritually progressed beings" -- hence "progressives" -- allegedly able to control their own fates merely by the power of their own thoughts), and the dunce-cap proletariat of the "un-evolved" masses, (all the rest of us who for whatever reason refuse to accept the New Age gospel). And just as the Christians elevate wealth to proof of divine favor, denounce the poor as "sinners" and rail that our poverty is proof of our "sin," so do the New Agers exalt riches as proof of enlightenment, dismiss poverty as nothing more than a "self-destructive lifestyle choice" and sneer at us poor as "hopelessly un-evolved." In either case, what is deftly ignored is the fact that capitalism is a slave ideology -- a giant pyramid scam fueled by the ever-worsening survival struggles of an ever-expanding underclass increasingly condemned to inescapable wretchedness.<p>
Thus we see the true function of New Age dogma: to replace the dying dogmas of Abrahamic religion and thereby reinforce the genuinely Nazi ethos at the core of capitalism. Just as Christian capitalists relentlessly savage their workers but find reassurance of their righteousness in church on Sunday, so now New Age executives do likewise in the privacy of their own posh dwellings: they chant some self-affirming mantra and assure themselves of their superiority merely by believing they can "visualize peace." Thus too the so-called New Age is merely the latest attempt to rationalize capitalism -- the most ecocidally parasitic, genocidally selfish ethos in human experience -- a fact proven beyond a scintilla of doubt by the huge corporate beneficence that finances the propagation of New Age beliefs. By contrast, the Gaia Hypothesis is positively subversive: it is the missing link that harmonizes ecology with socialism and -- by implication -- bonds spirituality and science in a mutually supportive manner unknown since the rise of patriarchy. It does all this because it brings us back, via science, to the ecological interdependence of all being -- the ancient knowledge that if one part of Earth Household becomes so predatory it jeopardizes the whole, the entirety of the household is programmed to rise against it and kill it: precisely the self-inflicted apocalypse we now euphemistically describe as global warming. To which adherents of the New Age -- defiantly self-centered to the pollution-bitter end -- will no doubt respond with yet another bumper-sticker: "visualize global cooling." <br>
<a href="http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/blup.cgi?entry_id=210748" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mu.nu/cgi/blup.cgi?entry_id=210748</a></br></p></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #15 by PPLE</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/15</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Democrats<p>are no better than Republicans, being corpwhorate minions and warmongers of the EXACT same ilk.<p>
NOTHING will be done by Democrats to stop the American Holocaust that has been going on across the planet for the last sixty years since the end of WW2 and the nazi-infested CIA was created.<p>
Nazi-infested CIA?<p>
Why yes indeed.<p>
<a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm</a></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Democrats<p>are no better than Republicans, being corpwhorate minions and warmongers of the EXACT same ilk.<p>
NOTHING will be done by Democrats to stop the American Holocaust that has been going on across the planet for the last sixty years since the end of WW2 and the nazi-infested CIA was created.<p>
Nazi-infested CIA?<p>
Why yes indeed.<p>
<a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB146/index.htm</a></p></p></p></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #16 by kmp</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:33:59 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/16</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Seems early<p>in the post to be breaking <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law" rel="nofollow">Godwin's Law, but hey, I'm just a dirty hippie. &nbsp;What do I know?<p>
Personally, as I can see the direction the MSM are heading, I suggest we start soliciting right now to cover Dave's medical bills. &nbsp;<p>
<a href="http://www.savedaveshead.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.savedaveshead.org</a></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Seems early<p>in the post to be breaking <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law" rel="nofollow">Godwin's Law, but hey, I'm just a dirty hippie. &nbsp;What do I know?<p>
Personally, as I can see the direction the MSM are heading, I suggest we start soliciting right now to cover Dave's medical bills. &nbsp;<p>
<a href="http://www.savedaveshead.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.savedaveshead.org</a></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #17 by ratshark</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 04:57:05 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/17</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dirty Hippies</strong></p><p>The hippies were (and are) right, ie., correct; righteous, and a lot more fun than conservative bastards.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dirty Hippies</strong></p><p>The hippies were (and are) right, ie., correct; righteous, and a lot more fun than conservative bastards.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #18 by pbearden47</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:38:47 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/18</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dirty Hippies, et.al.</strong></p><p>This was such a lovely rant. &nbsp;It made me feel better. &nbsp;<br>
I consider myself a mild-mannered, well-mannered and confident middle-aged (a little past) woman in the south. &nbsp;I don't press my opinions on people, but I'm not shy about stating my views and feelings. &nbsp;Since I was a teenager during the 60s, I get branded as a hippie by young whippersnappers who have no idea of what they're talking about - it just feels like a good insult to them. &nbsp;I've been called a feminazi because I really think women should have equal pay, and I informed this person that I'm proud to be a feminist. &nbsp;I was called a socialist because I voted for George McGovern back in the day. Tree-hugger, pinko commie lover. I'm not patriotic because I think invading a middle east country with no provocation is the stupidest act ever. &nbsp;People think "liberal" is the worst insult, and I just say look it up in the dictionary - doesn't sound so bad. &nbsp;<br>
So - stop the labeling and let's start discussing the issues and solving the problems. &nbsp;Respect and good manners aren't such a bad idea for any of us.

<p>Aunt Phyllis</p></br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dirty Hippies, et.al.</strong></p><p>This was such a lovely rant. &nbsp;It made me feel better. &nbsp;<br>
I consider myself a mild-mannered, well-mannered and confident middle-aged (a little past) woman in the south. &nbsp;I don't press my opinions on people, but I'm not shy about stating my views and feelings. &nbsp;Since I was a teenager during the 60s, I get branded as a hippie by young whippersnappers who have no idea of what they're talking about - it just feels like a good insult to them. &nbsp;I've been called a feminazi because I really think women should have equal pay, and I informed this person that I'm proud to be a feminist. &nbsp;I was called a socialist because I voted for George McGovern back in the day. Tree-hugger, pinko commie lover. I'm not patriotic because I think invading a middle east country with no provocation is the stupidest act ever. &nbsp;People think "liberal" is the worst insult, and I just say look it up in the dictionary - doesn't sound so bad. &nbsp;<br>
So - stop the labeling and let's start discussing the issues and solving the problems. &nbsp;Respect and good manners aren't such a bad idea for any of us.

<p>Aunt Phyllis</p></br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #19 by JoeyDiana</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:59:02 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/19</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>hippie</strong></p><p>highly intelligent person pursuing infinite enlightenment</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>hippie</strong></p><p>highly intelligent person pursuing infinite enlightenment</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #20 by Amfora</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:06:12 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/20</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>hippie style<p>"Beware the dirty hippies. They're immature and irresponsible. They're utopians and dreamers. They want free sex and legalized drugs and mandatory abortion." <br>
Plus cool music and permanent euphoria from freedom feeling. Great life-style and quite eco-friendly! I'm for hippie, free love with condoms and variable intimate life with <a href="http://www.edenfantasys.com/" rel="nofollow">sex toys. "You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one" (c)Lenon</a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>hippie style<p>"Beware the dirty hippies. They're immature and irresponsible. They're utopians and dreamers. They want free sex and legalized drugs and mandatory abortion." <br>
Plus cool music and permanent euphoria from freedom feeling. Great life-style and quite eco-friendly! I'm for hippie, free love with condoms and variable intimate life with <a href="http://www.edenfantasys.com/" rel="nofollow">sex toys. "You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one" (c)Lenon</a></br></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #21 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:55:43 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/21</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Thanks sex toy spammer!</strong></p><p>For reviving this fine thread.</p><p>
You are describing the culural dialectic DR. &nbsp;</p><p>
Revkin is a traitor. &nbsp;A mass delusional media sellout. &nbsp;A sophist. &nbsp;He pretends to possess principles, but really does not.</p><p>
Using principle to destroy it? &nbsp;To benefit your own bottomline that is benefitted by the corporate bottomline? &nbsp;Well we are in a material (corporate) world, aren't we material girl? &nbsp;Does Revkin giggle and pose like maddona in an 80s video when he cashes his check?</p><p>
He claims the progressive heritage, but does not do his part to keep it going. &nbsp;Recognize anyone we all know? &nbsp;Know thyselves, oh dirty hippies. &nbsp;All material girls now.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Thanks sex toy spammer!</strong></p><p>For reviving this fine thread.</p><p>
You are describing the culural dialectic DR. &nbsp;</p><p>
Revkin is a traitor. &nbsp;A mass delusional media sellout. &nbsp;A sophist. &nbsp;He pretends to possess principles, but really does not.</p><p>
Using principle to destroy it? &nbsp;To benefit your own bottomline that is benefitted by the corporate bottomline? &nbsp;Well we are in a material (corporate) world, aren't we material girl? &nbsp;Does Revkin giggle and pose like maddona in an 80s video when he cashes his check?</p><p>
He claims the progressive heritage, but does not do his part to keep it going. &nbsp;Recognize anyone we all know? &nbsp;Know thyselves, oh dirty hippies. &nbsp;All material girls now.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #22 by LegumeSam</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:39:29 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/a-long-rant-about-global-warming-and-dirty-hippies/22</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I liked David Roberts' rant</strong></p><p>I also liked PPLE's rant...

<p>http://www.dailykos.com/User/Cassiodorus</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>I liked David Roberts' rant</strong></p><p>I also liked PPLE's rant...

<p>http://www.dailykos.com/User/Cassiodorus</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>