<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for House Speaker says she has the votes for a cap-and-trade bill, but ...]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Billhook</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/Wait-and-Pelosi/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:49:17 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/Wait-and-Pelosi/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Premature Emissions' Control ?</strong></p><p>It is heartening that Ms Pelosi is aware that there are mysterious aspects to shaping a bill for Congress to establish a form of Cap, [Allocate] &amp; Trade.</p><p>
Were she to go flat out to get a bill ready for Obama to sign prior to Copenhagen,<br>
very bad outcomes could result, including the US lacking sufficient leeway in negotiations for agreement to be reached, and Obama's international credit being squandered by the failure.</p><p>
And anyone who thinks that America has only to tell the world to "Jump!" for the world to ask meekly "How high?"<br>
lost touch with the changing reality of international relations some years ago.</p><p>
The global climate treaty is surely the pre-eminent requirement, and outranks all national plans both in priority and in structural influence.</p><p>
So is Ms Pelosi unaware of this when she refers to 'mysterious' aspects ? Or is America now so indoctrinated to the cult of nationalist supremacy that she cannot acknowledge the reality in plain language in public ?</p><p>
Regards,</p><p>
Billhook</br></br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Premature Emissions' Control ?</strong></p><p>It is heartening that Ms Pelosi is aware that there are mysterious aspects to shaping a bill for Congress to establish a form of Cap, [Allocate] &amp; Trade.</p><p>
Were she to go flat out to get a bill ready for Obama to sign prior to Copenhagen,<br>
very bad outcomes could result, including the US lacking sufficient leeway in negotiations for agreement to be reached, and Obama's international credit being squandered by the failure.</p><p>
And anyone who thinks that America has only to tell the world to "Jump!" for the world to ask meekly "How high?"<br>
lost touch with the changing reality of international relations some years ago.</p><p>
The global climate treaty is surely the pre-eminent requirement, and outranks all national plans both in priority and in structural influence.</p><p>
So is Ms Pelosi unaware of this when she refers to 'mysterious' aspects ? Or is America now so indoctrinated to the cult of nationalist supremacy that she cannot acknowledge the reality in plain language in public ?</p><p>
Regards,</p><p>
Billhook</br></br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>