<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for San Francisco mayor proposes city carbon tax]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Wolverine</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/SFcarbonTax/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:12:07 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/SFcarbonTax/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Getting Employees To Eschew Cars</strong></p><p>While I applaud the effort, there is little chance that people will give up driving just because their employer will get a tax break for it. &nbsp;Employers will have to have some pretty significant sticks and carrots in order to get their employees out of their cars. &nbsp;A carbon tax on DRIVERS would be a much more effective approach, but would probably not be politically popular (though in SF, who knows?), which is the most likely reason that a politician like Newsom won't try that.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Getting Employees To Eschew Cars</strong></p><p>While I applaud the effort, there is little chance that people will give up driving just because their employer will get a tax break for it. &nbsp;Employers will have to have some pretty significant sticks and carrots in order to get their employees out of their cars. &nbsp;A carbon tax on DRIVERS would be a much more effective approach, but would probably not be politically popular (though in SF, who knows?), which is the most likely reason that a politician like Newsom won't try that.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>