<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Obama puts climate and energy atop his priorities list in his first address to Congress]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by ce1907</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:28:05 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>weasel words</strong></p><p>"send me legislation"</p><p>
will not happen</p><p>
unless the big O leads -- not sits there waiting to catch the magic bill</p><p>
never mind "send me" Mr. President</p><p>
send us</p><p>
YOUR plan</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>weasel words</strong></p><p>"send me legislation"</p><p>
will not happen</p><p>
unless the big O leads -- not sits there waiting to catch the magic bill</p><p>
never mind "send me" Mr. President</p><p>
send us</p><p>
YOUR plan</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by guade00</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:57:04 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>About sending legislation...</strong></p><p>Read Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution. </p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>About sending legislation...</strong></p><p>Read Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution. </p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:24:10 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Fret Not, Democrats</strong></p><p><br>
The problem has already been solved...because Bush invested in Hydrogen technology.</p><p>
No need to fret.</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Fret Not, Democrats</strong></p><p><br>
The problem has already been solved...because Bush invested in Hydrogen technology.</p><p>
No need to fret.</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by Tom Laskawy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:49:01 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ending ag subsidies?<p>This is probably a reference to the current <a href="http://tinyurl.com/d9jluw" rel="nofollow">rulemaking going on regarding subsidy eligibility. &nbsp;The 2008 Farm Bill reduced the amount farmers could make and still receive subsidies - the USDA has to write the new regulations. I don't expect this represents any new proposals.</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Ending ag subsidies?<p>This is probably a reference to the current <a href="http://tinyurl.com/d9jluw" rel="nofollow">rulemaking going on regarding subsidy eligibility. &nbsp;The 2008 Farm Bill reduced the amount farmers could make and still receive subsidies - the USDA has to write the new regulations. I don't expect this represents any new proposals.</a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by Jake Schmidt</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:06:31 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Capping and leading internationally<p>President Obama has provided another clear signal that the US needs to be a leader in developing solutions to global warming and that addressing this challenge is one of his top priorities (as I discussed here: <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jschmidt/obamas_speech_international_implications.html" rel="nofollow">http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jschmidt/obamas_speech_ ...)<p>
He stressed the need for this Congress to pass legislation to cap global warming pollution. It is crucial to pass a cap on global warming pollution this year if we want to help secure a strong international agreement to address global warming. The US needs to lead! <p>
There are a lot of pieces that need to come together to get a strong agreement in Copenhagen, but the key cornerstone is strong action from the US. If the US leads then I believe that other countries will commit to strong actions as well. They are waiting for the clear signal that the US is serious.<br>


<p>Jake Schmidt
International Climate Policy Director
Natural Resources Defense Council</p></br></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Capping and leading internationally<p>President Obama has provided another clear signal that the US needs to be a leader in developing solutions to global warming and that addressing this challenge is one of his top priorities (as I discussed here: <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jschmidt/obamas_speech_international_implications.html" rel="nofollow">http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jschmidt/obamas_speech_ ...)<p>
He stressed the need for this Congress to pass legislation to cap global warming pollution. It is crucial to pass a cap on global warming pollution this year if we want to help secure a strong international agreement to address global warming. The US needs to lead! <p>
There are a lot of pieces that need to come together to get a strong agreement in Copenhagen, but the key cornerstone is strong action from the US. If the US leads then I believe that other countries will commit to strong actions as well. They are waiting for the clear signal that the US is serious.<br>


<p>Jake Schmidt
International Climate Policy Director
Natural Resources Defense Council</p></br></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:37:17 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Advanced biofuels and clean coal&quot;</strong></p><p>Those were the key slip ups on energy/climate policy. &nbsp;But he didn't mention "nuke-you-ler" power as Bobby J did.</p><p>
Chris Mathews caught the "clean coal" greenwash, but missed the cellulosic ethanol reference, "advanced biofuels".</p><p>
Maybe we will see "renewable super grid" and "electrified transportation" soon?</p><p>
More information on alternatives to clean coal and advanced biofuels needs to get to the president.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin </p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>&quot;Advanced biofuels and clean coal&quot;</strong></p><p>Those were the key slip ups on energy/climate policy. &nbsp;But he didn't mention "nuke-you-ler" power as Bobby J did.</p><p>
Chris Mathews caught the "clean coal" greenwash, but missed the cellulosic ethanol reference, "advanced biofuels".</p><p>
Maybe we will see "renewable super grid" and "electrified transportation" soon?</p><p>
More information on alternatives to clean coal and advanced biofuels needs to get to the president.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin </p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by F James Handley</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:21:26 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dr. Hansen: Carbon Prices, Not Secondary Markets<p>No telling what President Obama meant in terms of timing (this session or this Congress) or mechanism (tax or cap), but House Ways &amp; Means (the greenest committee on the Hill) is studying simple price-based mechanisms to reduce GHG emissions. See <a href="http://www.carbontax.org/" rel="nofollow">Hansen Tells Ways &amp; Means: Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax Needed to Spur Clean Technology Revolution. &nbsp;<br>
</br></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Dr. Hansen: Carbon Prices, Not Secondary Markets<p>No telling what President Obama meant in terms of timing (this session or this Congress) or mechanism (tax or cap), but House Ways &amp; Means (the greenest committee on the Hill) is studying simple price-based mechanisms to reduce GHG emissions. See <a href="http://www.carbontax.org/" rel="nofollow">Hansen Tells Ways &amp; Means: Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax Needed to Spur Clean Technology Revolution. &nbsp;<br>
</br></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #8 by amazingdrx</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:40:25 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/It-begins-with-energy/8</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cap and price?</strong></p><p>I think that's what Obama said. &nbsp;So some sort of permits that act as a tax and a solid ever lowering cap, year after year decrease in GHG.</p><p>
I'm not so sure, I think he could wiggle out of the new tax attack by just diverting fossil fuel subsidies as a way to price carbon. &nbsp;The 50 billion per year in corporate welfare invested in renewable energy and conservation would insure the gradual progress.</p><p>
It would allow a realistic reduction in GHG based energy of say 6% per year. &nbsp;That's a good cap, it's tight enough.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin </p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cap and price?</strong></p><p>I think that's what Obama said. &nbsp;So some sort of permits that act as a tax and a solid ever lowering cap, year after year decrease in GHG.</p><p>
I'm not so sure, I think he could wiggle out of the new tax attack by just diverting fossil fuel subsidies as a way to price carbon. &nbsp;The 50 billion per year in corporate welfare invested in renewable energy and conservation would insure the gradual progress.</p><p>
It would allow a realistic reduction in GHG based energy of say 6% per year. &nbsp;That's a good cap, it's tight enough.

<p>http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog     John Schneider, Northern Wisconsin </p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>