<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for EPA&#8217;s economic analysis of climate bill relatively favorable]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by certvista</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/EPArpt/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:54:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/EPArpt/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>US agency estimation<p>About the The US agency estimated the bill would likely cut U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions 11 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and about 56 percent below by 2050. I dont think so it will be a good estimation, there are some other indirect facotrs can involved. Any how lets see how this things can be solved earlier.<a href="http://www.cert-vista.com/640-802.htm" rel="nofollow">640-802 and <a href="http://www.cert-vista.com/350-001.htm" rel="nofollow">350-001.<p>
&nbsp;</p></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>US agency estimation<p>About the The US agency estimated the bill would likely cut U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions 11 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and about 56 percent below by 2050. I dont think so it will be a good estimation, there are some other indirect facotrs can involved. Any how lets see how this things can be solved earlier.<a href="http://www.cert-vista.com/640-802.htm" rel="nofollow">640-802 and <a href="http://www.cert-vista.com/350-001.htm" rel="nofollow">350-001.<p>
&nbsp;</p></a></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>