<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Business/enviro alliance unveils climate plan, attracts critics]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by F James Handley</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:02:32 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Carbon Tax gains momentum as cap-n-trade fades<p>Describing USCAP's proposal, Pew's Eileen Claussen said, "all the components of the plan are linked." &nbsp; So are the players. &nbsp;All betting on a piece of the revenue "pie". &nbsp;From what I can tell, ("transparency" isn't a word associated with cap-and-trade) "dessert" is expected to be served through free allowances, offsets and subsidies funded by a hidden, regressive, volatile tax, called a "cap." <p>
That dog won't hunt. &nbsp;That "give-away" plan was Lieberman-Warner. Senator Corker didn't sit quietly for it. &nbsp;He's reportedly drafting a carbon tax bill as are Rep's Larson and Inglis. Rep. Stark has just introduced one. &nbsp;All expect to feature revenue recycling. &nbsp;Think bi-partisan revenue-neutral carbon tax. &nbsp; See <a href="http://www.pricecarbon.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.pricecarbon.org.<p>
- James Handley &nbsp; </p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Carbon Tax gains momentum as cap-n-trade fades<p>Describing USCAP's proposal, Pew's Eileen Claussen said, "all the components of the plan are linked." &nbsp; So are the players. &nbsp;All betting on a piece of the revenue "pie". &nbsp;From what I can tell, ("transparency" isn't a word associated with cap-and-trade) "dessert" is expected to be served through free allowances, offsets and subsidies funded by a hidden, regressive, volatile tax, called a "cap." <p>
That dog won't hunt. &nbsp;That "give-away" plan was Lieberman-Warner. Senator Corker didn't sit quietly for it. &nbsp;He's reportedly drafting a carbon tax bill as are Rep's Larson and Inglis. Rep. Stark has just introduced one. &nbsp;All expect to feature revenue recycling. &nbsp;Think bi-partisan revenue-neutral carbon tax. &nbsp; See <a href="http://www.pricecarbon.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.pricecarbon.org.<p>
- James Handley &nbsp; </p></a></p></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by wolfger</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:53:57 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cap&amp;Trade doesn't work the demand side</strong></p><p>I'm fully supportive of a carbon tax with rebates after we eliminate all current subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. &nbsp;Cap&amp;Trade is the devil's playground and that is why it has so much industry support. &nbsp;It has too many middle men and will have little transparency, akin to the cause of our financial meltdown.<br>
If we do end up with cap&amp;trade, carbon offsets should include demand side management. &nbsp;Consider that around half of all pregnancies around the world are not planned because of lack of education or lack of birth control. &nbsp;It costs around $40 dollars to prevent an unplanned pregnancy and that can save up to 1000 tons of lifetime CO2 generation. &nbsp;Multiply that by the 70 million more people on this planet every year and you can see a tremendous CO2 emission saving.</br></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cap&amp;Trade doesn't work the demand side</strong></p><p>I'm fully supportive of a carbon tax with rebates after we eliminate all current subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. &nbsp;Cap&amp;Trade is the devil's playground and that is why it has so much industry support. &nbsp;It has too many middle men and will have little transparency, akin to the cause of our financial meltdown.<br>
If we do end up with cap&amp;trade, carbon offsets should include demand side management. &nbsp;Consider that around half of all pregnancies around the world are not planned because of lack of education or lack of birth control. &nbsp;It costs around $40 dollars to prevent an unplanned pregnancy and that can save up to 1000 tons of lifetime CO2 generation. &nbsp;Multiply that by the 70 million more people on this planet every year and you can see a tremendous CO2 emission saving.</br></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by geoark</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:53:04 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cap &amp; Charade<p>Please see <a href="http://www.carbontax.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.carbontax.org/ for good information on why a direct carbon tax is five times more effective than any "cap &amp; charade" schemes.<p>
cha&#8901;rade: &nbsp;3. a blatant pretense or deception, esp. something so full of pretense as to be a travesty. <p>
Also, if you look who funds some of the "environmental" groups you will understand that they are not representing environmental interests in these "deals". &nbsp;<p>
GeoArk<br>
Save your job, save your business, save your planet: Tax Waste, Not Work.<br>
</br></br></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>Cap &amp; Charade<p>Please see <a href="http://www.carbontax.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.carbontax.org/ for good information on why a direct carbon tax is five times more effective than any "cap &amp; charade" schemes.<p>
cha&#8901;rade: &nbsp;3. a blatant pretense or deception, esp. something so full of pretense as to be a travesty. <p>
Also, if you look who funds some of the "environmental" groups you will understand that they are not representing environmental interests in these "deals". &nbsp;<p>
GeoArk<br>
Save your job, save your business, save your planet: Tax Waste, Not Work.<br>
</br></br></p></p></p></a></p></strong></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by GreyFlcn</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:01:33 -0800</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/Bustin-a-USCAP-/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>So how about</strong></p><p>"Carbon Tax&amp;Rebate"

<p>-David Ahlport</p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p><strong>So how about</strong></p><p>"Carbon Tax&amp;Rebate"

<p>-David Ahlport</p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>