<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Jeb Bush still skeptical about climate change]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Dave from Canada</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:02:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Dumbo?</p><p>Big Oil shill?</p><p>Both?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Dumbo?</p><p>Big Oil shill?</p><p>Both?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by davescott</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:57:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>The most respected scientific body in the world, the National Academy of Sciences, reviewed the climate science reports of the IPCC and called them "fundamentally sound."</p><p>How dare Jeb Bush call the NAS "politicized"?&nbsp; How dare he?&nbsp; What conceivable basis does he have for making that claim?</p><p>The only think politicized about global warmng is the right wing whackos who insist that their "opinion" should be given the same deference as the IPCC and the NAS.</p><p>And Bush proves that he joins Senator Inhofe and Alaska's departing governor&nbsp;in the ranks of unfit to govern.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>The most respected scientific body in the world, the National Academy of Sciences, reviewed the climate science reports of the IPCC and called them "fundamentally sound."</p><p>How dare Jeb Bush call the NAS "politicized"?&nbsp; How dare he?&nbsp; What conceivable basis does he have for making that claim?</p><p>The only think politicized about global warmng is the right wing whackos who insist that their "opinion" should be given the same deference as the IPCC and the NAS.</p><p>And Bush proves that he joins Senator Inhofe and Alaska's departing governor&nbsp;in the ranks of unfit to govern.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by davescott</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:00:58 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>He should read the interview with NOAA chief Jane Lubchencko.&nbsp; But of course if it doesnt gibe with what Rush says, it must be, uh, politicized.<p><a href="http://www.e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2169" rel="nofollow">http://www.e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2169<p>&nbsp;</p></a></p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>He should read the interview with NOAA chief Jane Lubchencko.&nbsp; But of course if it doesnt gibe with what Rush says, it must be, uh, politicized.<p><a href="http://www.e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2169" rel="nofollow">http://www.e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2169<p>&nbsp;</p></a></p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by tmullins</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:23:58 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>He should come to Appalachia and see for himself what his brother did to Wise County, Virginia.&nbsp;<p><a href="http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=138" rel="nofollow">http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=138<p>People's homes are becoming a mountaintop removal mining site !!!</p></a></p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>He should come to Appalachia and see for himself what his brother did to Wise County, Virginia.&nbsp;<p><a href="http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=138" rel="nofollow">http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=138<p>People's homes are becoming a mountaintop removal mining site !!!</p></a></p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by sanderson508</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:50:57 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-jeb-bush-still-skeptical-about-clim/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>How can a woman as smart as Barbara Bush have produced two children as dumb as Dubya and Jeb.&nbsp;&nbsp; I love the potential republican candidates, Jeb and Sarah.&nbsp;&nbsp; Either would be a sure bet to put the Dems back in the White House.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>How can a woman as smart as Barbara Bush have produced two children as dumb as Dubya and Jeb.&nbsp;&nbsp; I love the potential republican candidates, Jeb and Sarah.&nbsp;&nbsp; Either would be a sure bet to put the Dems back in the White House.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>