<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Timothy Wirth, natural-gas advocate, takes gas industry to task]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-17-timothy-wirth-natural-gas-advocate-takes-gas-industry-to-task/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:01:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-17-timothy-wirth-natural-gas-advocate-takes-gas-industry-to-task/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>NG has a very low energy density.</p><p>However, it can make hydrogen...the only solution to pollution that makes sense.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>NG has a very low energy density.</p><p>However, it can make hydrogen...the only solution to pollution that makes sense.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by neosapiens</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-17-timothy-wirth-natural-gas-advocate-takes-gas-industry-to-task/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:52:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-17-timothy-wirth-natural-gas-advocate-takes-gas-industry-to-task/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>It's much more economical and friendlier to the environment to simply burn the CH4 in the power plants we already have than to build a whole new hydrogen infrastructure and convert CH4 + O2 to CO2+ 2H2, especially if you consider that the CO2 must be stored somewhere and not just released into the atmosphere.&nbsp; Besides, H2 is the smallest molecule in the universe--it's much too hard to keep it from leaking into the atmosphere where 3H2 + O3 -&gt; 3H2O.&nbsp; What might happen to the ozone layer if we built a huge hydrogen economy?&nbsp;&nbsp; Using CH4 as a fuel is only a bridge to buy us some time to come up with better solutions, since CH4 is better than toxic mix that is coal.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>It's much more economical and friendlier to the environment to simply burn the CH4 in the power plants we already have than to build a whole new hydrogen infrastructure and convert CH4 + O2 to CO2+ 2H2, especially if you consider that the CO2 must be stored somewhere and not just released into the atmosphere.&nbsp; Besides, H2 is the smallest molecule in the universe--it's much too hard to keep it from leaking into the atmosphere where 3H2 + O3 -&gt; 3H2O.&nbsp; What might happen to the ozone layer if we built a huge hydrogen economy?&nbsp;&nbsp; Using CH4 as a fuel is only a bridge to buy us some time to come up with better solutions, since CH4 is better than toxic mix that is coal.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>