<![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Starbucks brews global green-building plan, renovates Seattle shop]]> Grist Comment Feed en Comment #1 by alaskalainen http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-30-starbucks-green-building/ Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:14:17 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-30-starbucks-green-building/1 So were they going to renovate anyway, and decided to do it in a green fashion, or did they rip out a perfectly good store so they could greenwash the walls?

]]> So were they going to renovate anyway, and decided to do it in a green fashion, or did they rip out a perfectly good store so they could greenwash the walls?

]]> Comment #2 by Seattle Inspector http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-30-starbucks-green-building/ Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:40:45 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-30-starbucks-green-building/2 Good article but Alaskalainen has a good point. Not always greener on the other side of the fence.

Seattle area home owners get your Energy Audits and save $25.00 by mention of Grist website: http://www.PacificNorthwestInspections.com

Helping one home at a time.

]]> Good article but Alaskalainen has a good point. Not always greener on the other side of the fence.

Seattle area home owners get your Energy Audits and save $25.00 by mention of Grist website: http://www.PacificNorthwestInspections.com

Helping one home at a time.

]]> Comment #3 by Username http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-30-starbucks-green-building/ Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:21:40 -0700 http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-30-starbucks-green-building/3 I agree with Alaskalainen, and he's got a good point.

]]> I agree with Alaskalainen, and he's got a good point.

]]>