<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for California is new front line of BPA fight]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by splashy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-29-bpa-consumers-union-calif/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 02:38:02 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-29-bpa-consumers-union-calif/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>I've been relieved to see that cans with veggies in them are now plastic free, at least where I buy them. It's also great that some of the big retailers have taken them off their shelves.</p><p>I'm wondering about the smaller retailers. Can they get their investment back from those that supplied the BPA containing items? I hope so, so they can sell better goods without it hurting them too much.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>I've been relieved to see that cans with veggies in them are now plastic free, at least where I buy them. It's also great that some of the big retailers have taken them off their shelves.</p><p>I'm wondering about the smaller retailers. Can they get their investment back from those that supplied the BPA containing items? I hope so, so they can sell better goods without it hurting them too much.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>