<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Al Gore offers support of .eco domain]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Andreajoy</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-22-al-gore-dot-eco-domain-video/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:11:49 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-22-al-gore-dot-eco-domain-video/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>I dunno, there's something missing from this pitch. What could it be?&nbsp; Oh, I know...women!</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>I dunno, there's something missing from this pitch. What could it be?&nbsp; Oh, I know...women!</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by wuthnow</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-22-al-gore-dot-eco-domain-video/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:31:20 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-22-al-gore-dot-eco-domain-video/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>You're right - &nbsp;no women, and all looking a bit pale on it too. &nbsp;</p><p>What also&nbsp;concerns me is the potential for greenwashers to take advantage of this domain. &nbsp;One of the speakers here says there will be screening to make sure that companies/ngos/individuals genuinely support earth-friendly policies and practices. &nbsp; But what will be the criteria, determined by whom, monitored by whom? &nbsp;This has real potential to be (another) feel-good marketing bandwagon unless there's a lot of work done to give it some real substance.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>You're right - &nbsp;no women, and all looking a bit pale on it too. &nbsp;</p><p>What also&nbsp;concerns me is the potential for greenwashers to take advantage of this domain. &nbsp;One of the speakers here says there will be screening to make sure that companies/ngos/individuals genuinely support earth-friendly policies and practices. &nbsp; But what will be the criteria, determined by whom, monitored by whom? &nbsp;This has real potential to be (another) feel-good marketing bandwagon unless there's a lot of work done to give it some real substance.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>