<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Enviros cringe as Senate committee approves energy bill]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Brudaimonia</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-17-senate-approves-energy-bill/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:54:23 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-17-senate-approves-energy-bill/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/17/AR2009061701699.html" rel="nofollow">Washington Post article:<p>"To stretch federal dollars across more proposed [nuclear] plants, the Energy
Department has been lobbying the Japanese government to extend export
credits and loan guarantees to the plants using Toshiba designs and to
persuade the French export credit agency, Coface, to help back the
Areva design at Calvert Cliffs. <strong>Those agencies usually help promote
exports to poor or developing countries, not to aid a project in the
world's richest economy."<p>I am not knowledgeable about the ethics of Coface's or another credit agency's projects, but this is a perfect example of the legitimate concern over nuclear power's risk, and the amount of insurance needed to mitigate that risk.<p>Not every large construction project that carries a lot of risk is unwise, but in nuclear power's case, we have so many alternatives, including the simplest one: reducing wasted electricity generation.</p></p></strong></p></a></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/17/AR2009061701699.html" rel="nofollow">Washington Post article:<p>"To stretch federal dollars across more proposed [nuclear] plants, the Energy
Department has been lobbying the Japanese government to extend export
credits and loan guarantees to the plants using Toshiba designs and to
persuade the French export credit agency, Coface, to help back the
Areva design at Calvert Cliffs. <strong>Those agencies usually help promote
exports to poor or developing countries, not to aid a project in the
world's richest economy."<p>I am not knowledgeable about the ethics of Coface's or another credit agency's projects, but this is a perfect example of the legitimate concern over nuclear power's risk, and the amount of insurance needed to mitigate that risk.<p>Not every large construction project that carries a lot of risk is unwise, but in nuclear power's case, we have so many alternatives, including the simplest one: reducing wasted electricity generation.</p></p></strong></p></a></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by mmooney</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-17-senate-approves-energy-bill/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:30:42 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-17-senate-approves-energy-bill/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>"Bingaman stressed that the bill is the product of compromise."<p>Everyone hates a good compromise, and this one isn't even good.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.salazar.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm" rel="nofollow">Call your senator and tell them this bill must better Waxman-Markey's targets or else hit the recycling bin.</a></p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>"Bingaman stressed that the bill is the product of compromise."<p>Everyone hates a good compromise, and this one isn't even good.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.salazar.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm" rel="nofollow">Call your senator and tell them this bill must better Waxman-Markey's targets or else hit the recycling bin.</a></p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by ed abbey</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-17-senate-approves-energy-bill/</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:54:21 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-17-senate-approves-energy-bill/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Still no mention of the big push by industry, government and many in Big Green for more biomass incinerators (or BIOMESS as we like to say). Grist is truly asleep at the switch on this one. If all these supposed "renewable" sources of energy are built you can kiss your improved air quailty and a good number of forests goodbye. Some of these incinerators will be burning toxic C&amp;D materials, some will be burning "eco cubes" made from trash!, some will be burning both! Others will be burning whole trees along with slash and calling it "carbon neutral" (even though it will take decades for those carbon sequesting trees to grow back) and leading to more clearcutting.&nbsp; Biomass is a BIOMESS. Wake-up!</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Still no mention of the big push by industry, government and many in Big Green for more biomass incinerators (or BIOMESS as we like to say). Grist is truly asleep at the switch on this one. If all these supposed "renewable" sources of energy are built you can kiss your improved air quailty and a good number of forests goodbye. Some of these incinerators will be burning toxic C&amp;D materials, some will be burning "eco cubes" made from trash!, some will be burning both! Others will be burning whole trees along with slash and calling it "carbon neutral" (even though it will take decades for those carbon sequesting trees to grow back) and leading to more clearcutting.&nbsp; Biomass is a BIOMESS. Wake-up!</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>