<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Yeah, that&#8217;s right, I&#8217;ve been to boot camp]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Chris Pratt</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-02-retrofit-boot-camp-clinton/</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:58:28 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-06-02-retrofit-boot-camp-clinton/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Here is a topic I would really like to see debated.&nbsp; What do I do with my existing double hung windows?&nbsp; It has been debated before, but not in the context of carbon emissions, affordability and sustainablility.&nbsp; There is a corporate push to replace with new tilt-pack systems, but I think the correct and affordable solution is a state of the art retrofit of the existint windows.&nbsp; Anyone pursing that line of thinking?</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Here is a topic I would really like to see debated.&nbsp; What do I do with my existing double hung windows?&nbsp; It has been debated before, but not in the context of carbon emissions, affordability and sustainablility.&nbsp; There is a corporate push to replace with new tilt-pack systems, but I think the correct and affordable solution is a state of the art retrofit of the existint windows.&nbsp; Anyone pursing that line of thinking?</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>