<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Obama Supreme Court pick has small but solid record on environmental rulings]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by sbhecht</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-26-obama-supreme-court-pick/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-26-obama-supreme-court-pick/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Thanks for the informative post. &nbsp;My co-blogger Jonathan Zasloff at Legal Planet has noted that Sotomayor is on the appellate panel that has failed, a full three years after oral argument before the Second Circuit, to issue any decision on a very important climate change-related issue: whether states' nuisance case against coal-fired power plants was properly dismissed by a federal district court as a non-justiciable "political question." &nbsp;He also points out that Sotomayor's oral argument questioning on this case was thoughtful and incisive:<p><a href="http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/the-environmental-argument-against-sotomayor-sort-of/" rel="nofollow">http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/the-environmental-argument-against-sotomayor-sort-of/</a></p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Thanks for the informative post. &nbsp;My co-blogger Jonathan Zasloff at Legal Planet has noted that Sotomayor is on the appellate panel that has failed, a full three years after oral argument before the Second Circuit, to issue any decision on a very important climate change-related issue: whether states' nuisance case against coal-fired power plants was properly dismissed by a federal district court as a non-justiciable "political question." &nbsp;He also points out that Sotomayor's oral argument questioning on this case was thoughtful and incisive:<p><a href="http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/the-environmental-argument-against-sotomayor-sort-of/" rel="nofollow">http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/the-environmental-argument-against-sotomayor-sort-of/</a></p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by kv1009</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-26-obama-supreme-court-pick/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:02:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-26-obama-supreme-court-pick/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Kavi<p>-----<p>&nbsp;<p><a href="http://www.sysax.com/server/" rel="nofollow">FTP Server</a></p></p></p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Kavi<p>-----<p>&nbsp;<p><a href="http://www.sysax.com/server/" rel="nofollow">FTP Server</a></p></p></p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Catmoves</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-26-obama-supreme-court-pick/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:19:39 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-26-obama-supreme-court-pick/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>I sincerely hope this a misprint: "Latin American...." I hope she is an American, even born in the USA.&nbsp;</p><p>But I will&nbsp;never favor her being seated on the court, because this lady wants to take our guns away from us. And I have serious doubts about her really serving our conservationist aims.&nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>I sincerely hope this a misprint: "Latin American...." I hope she is an American, even born in the USA.&nbsp;</p><p>But I will&nbsp;never favor her being seated on the court, because this lady wants to take our guns away from us. And I have serious doubts about her really serving our conservationist aims.&nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>