<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for House Democrat defends OMB memo source]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Clifford Wells</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-15-democrat-defends-omb-source/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 09:02:53 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-15-democrat-defends-omb-source/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>I think the SBA Advocate should have spoken about the possible impacts on small businesses and not whether the EPA Administrator has the possibility (or demand) to regulate CO2.&nbsp; If one was smart, one could find some small businesses that could potentially be regulated, depending on how you define a "small business."&nbsp; For example, if you look at employees below 100 and/or revenue below 100 million, you might find a few that could be caught in the net.</p><p>My understanding is that the "net" would or could cover major, permitted sourced that have the potential to emit more than 25,000 tons a year of CO2.&nbsp;</p><p>Many years ago, the EPA started regulating major sources and started with the large electrical generation units, refineries, and heavy industries.&nbsp; True, over the decades regulations extended even to consumer goods and small triggering amounts of toxics (MACT).&nbsp; That's a reasonable fear for small business, "a big dog that we don't will bark or bite."&nbsp; But noooooo ... the Advocate had to blast the entire concept, large and small business.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>I think the SBA Advocate should have spoken about the possible impacts on small businesses and not whether the EPA Administrator has the possibility (or demand) to regulate CO2.&nbsp; If one was smart, one could find some small businesses that could potentially be regulated, depending on how you define a "small business."&nbsp; For example, if you look at employees below 100 and/or revenue below 100 million, you might find a few that could be caught in the net.</p><p>My understanding is that the "net" would or could cover major, permitted sourced that have the potential to emit more than 25,000 tons a year of CO2.&nbsp;</p><p>Many years ago, the EPA started regulating major sources and started with the large electrical generation units, refineries, and heavy industries.&nbsp; True, over the decades regulations extended even to consumer goods and small triggering amounts of toxics (MACT).&nbsp; That's a reasonable fear for small business, "a big dog that we don't will bark or bite."&nbsp; But noooooo ... the Advocate had to blast the entire concept, large and small business.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>