<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Drought, fish, and our fruit-and-veg problem]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by chrisbrandow</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-12-drought-fish-veg/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:34:10 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-12-drought-fish-veg/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>for some of the crops, yes, you are right, we should reduce, but in *many* of the cases you cite, I doubt that it is likely.&nbsp; artichokes for example are not just confined to CA production, they are confined to a 10 square mile area centered in Castroville CA, because they grow so so well there.&nbsp; and with lettuce, where else can you grow lettuce 365 days a year without getting too hot or too cold, too dry or too humid.&nbsp; and again, lettuce is not simply confined to CA, it is confined almost entirely to the Salinas valley.&nbsp; Strawberries: see winter; peaches.&nbsp; I agree they should be spread out more, but once an area like ca has a climactic advantage due to mild winters making early production possible, it is just so easy to add a few (hundred, or thousand) more acres of later maturing varieties as well.</p><p><br />I think of it like this during winter, CA is 100% production of many crops, so if during the summer all else is equal and CA is only 50% of production, then overall, CA is ~75% of production.&nbsp; With most crops its tough to get around that reality.</p></br>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>for some of the crops, yes, you are right, we should reduce, but in *many* of the cases you cite, I doubt that it is likely.&nbsp; artichokes for example are not just confined to CA production, they are confined to a 10 square mile area centered in Castroville CA, because they grow so so well there.&nbsp; and with lettuce, where else can you grow lettuce 365 days a year without getting too hot or too cold, too dry or too humid.&nbsp; and again, lettuce is not simply confined to CA, it is confined almost entirely to the Salinas valley.&nbsp; Strawberries: see winter; peaches.&nbsp; I agree they should be spread out more, but once an area like ca has a climactic advantage due to mild winters making early production possible, it is just so easy to add a few (hundred, or thousand) more acres of later maturing varieties as well.</p><p><br />I think of it like this during winter, CA is 100% production of many crops, so if during the summer all else is equal and CA is only 50% of production, then overall, CA is ~75% of production.&nbsp; With most crops its tough to get around that reality.</p></br>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Avelhingst</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-12-drought-fish-veg/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:15:49 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-12-drought-fish-veg/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>The silliest problem in this whole mess: the water for the farms and cities and irrigation districts doesn't come, legally, from the Delta but from storage reservoirs way up the Sacramento River and related network.&nbsp; The water is released into that river and makes its way down to the Delta, where gargantuan, science-fiction Year 3000 sized pumps suck up water.&nbsp; The currents generated from this pumping has long been known to be one of the most severe dangers to the Delta's ecology (in years when water supply isn't QUITE such a problem).&nbsp;<p>So: first job is to take the water supplying cities and irrigation districts in the project area and move it AROUND the Delta and avoild the mess in the Delta; then, only two almost insurmountable problems would remain - insuring enough water reaches the Delta so that estuarine functions continues and keeping toxins from accumulating in said water in amounts damaging (either acutely or chronically).<p>Moving fruit and vegetable production back to areas of demand instead of areas with the cheapest water and land and labour is a highly challenging initiative... I encourage the author to check out the efforts of the <a href="http://www.nabc.org/" rel="nofollow">Northwest Agricultural Business Center and look at how they address the shortages of labour, processing facilities, and land that can frusturate even the most innovative farmers.<p>&nbsp;</p></a></p></p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>The silliest problem in this whole mess: the water for the farms and cities and irrigation districts doesn't come, legally, from the Delta but from storage reservoirs way up the Sacramento River and related network.&nbsp; The water is released into that river and makes its way down to the Delta, where gargantuan, science-fiction Year 3000 sized pumps suck up water.&nbsp; The currents generated from this pumping has long been known to be one of the most severe dangers to the Delta's ecology (in years when water supply isn't QUITE such a problem).&nbsp;<p>So: first job is to take the water supplying cities and irrigation districts in the project area and move it AROUND the Delta and avoild the mess in the Delta; then, only two almost insurmountable problems would remain - insuring enough water reaches the Delta so that estuarine functions continues and keeping toxins from accumulating in said water in amounts damaging (either acutely or chronically).<p>Moving fruit and vegetable production back to areas of demand instead of areas with the cheapest water and land and labour is a highly challenging initiative... I encourage the author to check out the efforts of the <a href="http://www.nabc.org/" rel="nofollow">Northwest Agricultural Business Center and look at how they address the shortages of labour, processing facilities, and land that can frusturate even the most innovative farmers.<p>&nbsp;</p></a></p></p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by ArlVa</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-12-drought-fish-veg/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:15:32 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-12-drought-fish-veg/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>The obvious solution to this conundrum is to eat seasonally and locally...strawberries shipped 3,000 miles in December are unsustainable; ditto for lettuce, which is easy to grow anyway.&nbsp; Don't even get me started on East Coasters eating&nbsp;California peaches when we've got phenomenal peaches&nbsp;(not to mention berries, apples, pears, cherries etc)&nbsp;here all up the Eastern seaboard!&nbsp; If more people focused on eating seasonally and paid more attention to where their&nbsp;seasonal food is grown, then perhaps some pressure could be relieved from California's drought-stricken areas (and the chain reaction that follows).</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>The obvious solution to this conundrum is to eat seasonally and locally...strawberries shipped 3,000 miles in December are unsustainable; ditto for lettuce, which is easy to grow anyway.&nbsp; Don't even get me started on East Coasters eating&nbsp;California peaches when we've got phenomenal peaches&nbsp;(not to mention berries, apples, pears, cherries etc)&nbsp;here all up the Eastern seaboard!&nbsp; If more people focused on eating seasonally and paid more attention to where their&nbsp;seasonal food is grown, then perhaps some pressure could be relieved from California's drought-stricken areas (and the chain reaction that follows).</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>