<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for Greenpeace&#8217;s new leader talks up need for a green grassroots]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Erik Hoffner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-14-greenpeaces-new-leader-talks/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:26:55 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-14-greenpeaces-new-leader-talks/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				Yes, good news that Phil is a grassroots guy, and one who cut his teeth with the PIRGs. That said, it's not such huge news that Greenpeace is going grassroots - that's been what delineates them from the other big green groups for a long time. The continued emphasis is great, though.

His critique of the movement lacking grassroots gumption should really be read as being focused on the Big Green groups - NRDC, EDF, CI, WCS, WWF, etc and to a lesser extent Sierra. As he mentions, groups like 1Sky are very effective, and on a fraction of the budget. I know a zillion great groups like it around the continent, and I should, it's my job. Check out the members of the Orion Grassroots Network, Phil, there's some solid partners for you here: <a href="http://www.oriongrassroots.org/members" rel="nofollow">http://www.oriongrassroots.org/members - Erik, Orion Grassroots Network</a>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				Yes, good news that Phil is a grassroots guy, and one who cut his teeth with the PIRGs. That said, it's not such huge news that Greenpeace is going grassroots - that's been what delineates them from the other big green groups for a long time. The continued emphasis is great, though.

His critique of the movement lacking grassroots gumption should really be read as being focused on the Big Green groups - NRDC, EDF, CI, WCS, WWF, etc and to a lesser extent Sierra. As he mentions, groups like 1Sky are very effective, and on a fraction of the budget. I know a zillion great groups like it around the continent, and I should, it's my job. Check out the members of the Orion Grassroots Network, Phil, there's some solid partners for you here: <a href="http://www.oriongrassroots.org/members" rel="nofollow">http://www.oriongrassroots.org/members - Erik, Orion Grassroots Network</a>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Ken Ward</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-14-greenpeaces-new-leader-talks/</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:47:45 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-14-greenpeaces-new-leader-talks/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Well.... yes, but I think there is a tendency to see environmental work on a continuum with schmoozing at one end and "genuine" grassroots work at the other. This neither gives appropriate due to the hard lifting that our advocacy oriented outfits - including all named on the above list - have done, nor does it take into account the truly unique Greenpeace contributions to environmental campaigning. Local organizing can be as restrictive and low yield as lobbying with limited power. What Greenpeace can offer is the electrifying,&nbsp; audacious and moral dimension, through actions that are not always comfortable, even for erstwhile supporters. Actions have been denigrated in recent years, which is justified where the approach is taken to mean not much more than banner hanging and another animal costume, but the essential elements of GP campaigning are still the only means environmentalists have for transformational political action - and I sincerely hope that this is the direction the organization, under a guy who was doing prescient climate action organizing while still nearly in his nappies, will be heading.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Well.... yes, but I think there is a tendency to see environmental work on a continuum with schmoozing at one end and "genuine" grassroots work at the other. This neither gives appropriate due to the hard lifting that our advocacy oriented outfits - including all named on the above list - have done, nor does it take into account the truly unique Greenpeace contributions to environmental campaigning. Local organizing can be as restrictive and low yield as lobbying with limited power. What Greenpeace can offer is the electrifying,&nbsp; audacious and moral dimension, through actions that are not always comfortable, even for erstwhile supporters. Actions have been denigrated in recent years, which is justified where the approach is taken to mean not much more than banner hanging and another animal costume, but the essential elements of GP campaigning are still the only means environmentalists have for transformational political action - and I sincerely hope that this is the direction the organization, under a guy who was doing prescient climate action organizing while still nearly in his nappies, will be heading.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>