<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[Grist - Comment Feed for America&#8217;s first solar city, from a former NFL player]]></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grist.org/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Grist Comment Feed</description>
	<language>en</language>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #1 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:38:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/1</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Unless he plans to actually build those mid-rises himself, and then lease 'em, they will not end up lookin' like that.</p><p>Most likely what will happen is that each plat of land will be sold under "guidelines" towards environmental design and green architecture, but each individual developer will decide how best to meet that criteria.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Unless he plans to actually build those mid-rises himself, and then lease 'em, they will not end up lookin' like that.</p><p>Most likely what will happen is that each plat of land will be sold under "guidelines" towards environmental design and green architecture, but each individual developer will decide how best to meet that criteria.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #2 by Tasermons Partner</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:38:53 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/2</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>Unless he plans to actually build those mid-rises himself, and then lease 'em, they will not end up lookin' like that.</p><p>Most likely what will happen is that each plat of land will be sold under "guidelines" towards environmental design and green architecture, but each individual developer will decide how best to meet that criteria.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>Unless he plans to actually build those mid-rises himself, and then lease 'em, they will not end up lookin' like that.</p><p>Most likely what will happen is that each plat of land will be sold under "guidelines" towards environmental design and green architecture, but each individual developer will decide how best to meet that criteria.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #3 by Delay And Deny</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:17:41 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/3</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>And the perfect car to drive in the Solar City?<p><a href="http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2678/69/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2678/69/<p>Today at the New York Auto Show, the <strong>Honda FCX Clarity was named the <strong>World Green Car of the Year. It beat out competition from an initial list of 22 cars, but ultimately went up against other top 3 finalists the Mitsubishi iMiEV and the Toyota iQ.

The FCX is powered by a hydrogen fuel cell...of course.</strong></strong></p></a></p></p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>And the perfect car to drive in the Solar City?<p><a href="http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2678/69/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/2678/69/<p>Today at the New York Auto Show, the <strong>Honda FCX Clarity was named the <strong>World Green Car of the Year. It beat out competition from an initial list of 22 cars, but ultimately went up against other top 3 finalists the Mitsubishi iMiEV and the Toyota iQ.

The FCX is powered by a hydrogen fuel cell...of course.</strong></strong></p></a></p></p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #4 by sidder</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:59:16 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/4</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>that would be a awsome spot to live.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>that would be a awsome spot to live.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #5 by greengenie4</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:30:50 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/5</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>The future drowning solar city of USA... This is a great concept, but why put it in Florida of all places, and specifically on the COAST?! With sea-level rising half of the development is likely to be flooded by the end of the century. Isn't the point of a renewable energy/solar city to reap as much from the benefits of long-term sustainability as possible? Not to mention even though he's got the right idea as a developer, this would certainly not help the coastal marine ecosystem which is already at risk of collapse. Move the city inland, or better yet, OUT of Florida - the land of retirement communities and wasps.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>The future drowning solar city of USA... This is a great concept, but why put it in Florida of all places, and specifically on the COAST?! With sea-level rising half of the development is likely to be flooded by the end of the century. Isn't the point of a renewable energy/solar city to reap as much from the benefits of long-term sustainability as possible? Not to mention even though he's got the right idea as a developer, this would certainly not help the coastal marine ecosystem which is already at risk of collapse. Move the city inland, or better yet, OUT of Florida - the land of retirement communities and wasps.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #6 by briandi11</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/6</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				As a FLA native and active environmentalist I am in complete disagreement with such a project.  Does Florida need more housing?  And if so will it be affordable housing for those who have been misplaced by hurricanes and foreclosure?  Doubtful.  Also how will a "mega development" help the environment?  Even if it is solar powered, it takes loads of energy to make solar panels.  Will they be hiring ONLY local subcontractors?  And will these subcontractors be riding their bikes to work?  Again doubtful.  Where will all of the materials to build these home come from?  I think this is the wrong direction for Florida and for the Country.  Why not focus on retrofitting the millions of existing homes in Florida.  Also this article does not mention that Kitson will be partnering with FPL who will raise most of the funds by raising customers monthly bill.  This hardly seems fair.  Oh and this is land aquired orginally for the intention of preservation...I guess it won't hurt to use 17,000 acres of natural habitat to build more in Florida!
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				As a FLA native and active environmentalist I am in complete disagreement with such a project.  Does Florida need more housing?  And if so will it be affordable housing for those who have been misplaced by hurricanes and foreclosure?  Doubtful.  Also how will a "mega development" help the environment?  Even if it is solar powered, it takes loads of energy to make solar panels.  Will they be hiring ONLY local subcontractors?  And will these subcontractors be riding their bikes to work?  Again doubtful.  Where will all of the materials to build these home come from?  I think this is the wrong direction for Florida and for the Country.  Why not focus on retrofitting the millions of existing homes in Florida.  Also this article does not mention that Kitson will be partnering with FPL who will raise most of the funds by raising customers monthly bill.  This hardly seems fair.  Oh and this is land aquired orginally for the intention of preservation...I guess it won't hurt to use 17,000 acres of natural habitat to build more in Florida!
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
		<item>
            <title>Comment #7 by Drunken Pixie</title>
			<link>http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:01:57 -0700</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-10-americas-first-solar-city-fro/7</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[
				<p>It's a novel idea. Shame about the impractical location, though.</p>
			]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
				<p>It's a novel idea. Shame about the impractical location, though.</p>
			]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
    
 </channel>
</rss>