|
|
||
Blast Off!Momentum grows for greener ways of farming28 Sep 2001
Rice as rice can be.
Rice blast is caused by a fungus that cuts off nutrients to the rice seed head and destroys crops. It thrives in rice monocultures and particularly favors the short-grained, or sticky, strains of rice that bring the highest price at Yunnan's markets. By 1998, many farmers had given up growing sticky rice altogether, even though there was significant market demand. That's when researchers from Yunnan Agricultural University in Kunming began attending village meetings in Jianshu and Shiping counties. They explained how a local farmer had almost no rice blast when he mixed his crops, planting rows of sticky rice between rows of long-grain rice. Although monocultures were susceptible to the blast, mixed plantings seemed to resist it.
Oh, blast! The fungus leaves its mark in a paddy.
Photo: University of California at Davis.
The success was summed up by a farmer who said, "More rice, more money." But it was more than that: The mixed plantings were also much better for the environment. No longer were the rice paddies a toxic, fungicide soup. This double-whammy benefit underlies "ecoagriculture," an emerging strategy that blends farming and environmentalism. Old MacDonald Had an Eco-farm "There's been a history of adversarial relations," says Sarah Lynch, senior program officer in the Center for Conservation Innovation at the World Wildlife Fund. "But I think a lot of us are coming to the conclusion that many farmers love nature and wildlife, and under other circumstances, they'd be called environmentalists."
Size small.
The problem is straightforward: Farming is one of the leading threats to biodiversity. Clearing of forestlands for pasture and crops, farming on marginal lands, herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and habitat fragmentation all degrade biodiversity. Yet, demand for food is rising -- as much as 60 percent more will be needed by 2030, according to one projection. So what to do about all this? Enter ecoagriculture. The idea behind ecoagriculture is to rearrange market incentives so that farmers can make more money and feed more people, while protecting biodiversity and providing other "ecosystem services," the term used by economists to sum up the benefits of clean air, clean water, open space, and so on.
Coffee made in the shade.
Photo: Francisco Osuna, Elan Organic Coffees.
This strategy is a shift away from the top-down mandate -- the sort of government interference devoutly resented by many people and epitomized by the strictures of the U.S. Endangered Species Act -- and toward a market-oriented approach to conservation. "I think there's a misconception that farmers are not conservationists," says Sara Scherr, a fellow at Forest Trends, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit. Scherr wrote "Common Ground, Common Future" with Jeff McNeely, a researcher with the World Conservation Union. What farmers aren't willing to do, Scherr says, is "sacrifice their livelihood for conservation." Show Me the Money "People want to farm this way," McNeely says. "We're not going strongly against the tide." But because there is no single solution, ecoagriculture is hard to define. Success, McNeely says, "looks like diversity." He and Scherr have identified six broad ecoagriculture strategies:
Hanging out above a shaded coffee farm.
Photo: Francisco Osuna, Elan Organic Coffees.
Achieving ecoagriculture won't be easy, though, because at bottom it is about teaching people new ways to farm -- albeit the new ways often borrow from traditional farming methods that worked with nature rather than against it. "This is the beginning of a long-term initiative," says Scherr. Proponents of ecoagriculture admit it has limits. But they also think this is a teachable moment, a time when many farmers around the world are desperate for alternatives to a system in which they depend too heavily on chemical and petroleum inputs, produce a glut of food, and abuse their surroundings. "There's a great deal of desperation in the agricultural world," says Scherr. "The real breakthrough will be in developing a new production system in which society enjoys the environmental benefits, and the farmer gets the benefits of a greater income. It's really got to come from finding ways to kill three birds with one stone." |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
![]() From the Archives
The Right Stuff, by Keith Schneider. Has Bush done the environment a favor with his extreme agenda? .
Sharps Shooter, by David Mayfield. Colorado man cleans up war-game carnage.
Lake Mess Again, by Keith Schneider. A plan to drill under the Great Lakes is fracturing the Michigan Republican Party.
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.