Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

Freight Fright

Organic farmers in Africa fear for their livelihoods as U.K. frets over food miles

Small-scale organic farmers in Kenya and other African countries are waiting anxiously to find out whether the U.K.'s main organic certifier, the Soil Association, will withdraw organic certification from food items that are flown in from far-flung regions. Concerned that the air-freighting of food contributes to global warming, the Soil Association has been contemplating the move as a way to get Brits to buy local. Critics of the proposal say it could destroy the livelihoods of tens of thousands of Africans who work on organic farms. Critics also question the assumption that food produced in Britain has a lower carbon footprint than food flown in from developing countries, noting that British farmers may heat greenhouses in cold climates, use tractors, and drive to their fields in cars. Says Elijah Koinange of the Organic Farmers' Group in Kenya, "They say our products are polluted, but the consumers take jets and create much more pollution than we do."

straight to the source: The Times, Jonathan Clayton, 02 Aug 2007
straight to the source: The Guardian, The Observer, Aidan Hartley, 15 Jul 2007


Comments: (1 comment)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

damn complicated, being responsible

Isn't there a shortage of food in Africa, with all that land already devoted to cash crops and now biofuel?

(1) Shouldn't African farmers be encouraged to sell their organic produce to their neighbors? If they earn more exporting it, there must be some other problem there.

(2) Are "environmentalists" going to decide its okay to contribute to global climate change as long as you are supporting economic development in poor nations? Now that's an interesting moral problem. And it undermines much of their other policies.

(3) Why doesn't the British organization just establish a maximum net carbon dioxide emission standard -- due to transport or heating requirements -- for each product? Seems simple enough.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | Weekly Recipes | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks