|
|
||
Monday, 23 Jul 2007
Madness Takes Its TollSiberia attack leaves one anti-nuclear protester dead, others injuredA pre-dawn attack on an anti-nuclear protest camp in Siberia this weekend left one person dead and several others seriously injured. Twenty suspects have been detained for the crime, in which attackers wearing dark clothes and masks brandished metal pipes, chanted nationalist slogans, attempted to set tents on fire, and beat the crap out of as many of the 21 encamped environmentalists -- most of whom were sleeping -- as they could get their hands on. Authorities say they don't believe the protest itself -- which is focused on nuclear-waste processing at the state-owned Angarsk Electrolysis Chemical Plant and inspired by concerns that Russia plans to process spent nuclear fuel from abroad -- was the motive for the hatefest. Instead, they say, it may have been as simple as an argument or theft. "Investigators are inclined to believe that the attack was motivated by hooliganism with the aim of stealing property," said a local police spokesperson. Oh, those wacky hooligans. What'll they do next?
Thames FugitEngland walloped by historic floodsIt's a "summer of suffering" in England, as severe flooding wreaks havoc across the country. This weekend, floods in the central and southern part of the country left more than 350,000 people without drinking water and forced the evacuation of hundreds from their homes. The worst part, observers say, is that the waters are still rising -- and are on track to outpace record flooding from 1947. The crisis follows a June flood in the north that killed seven people and left 7,000 at least temporarily homeless. With the swollen Thames and Severn rivers threatening to burst and criticism rising almost as quickly, newly installed Prime Minister Gordon Brown flew over the affected areas and pledged to increase flood-defense spending. "Obviously like every advanced industrial country we're coming to terms with some of the issues surrounding climate change," he said at a press conference, noting that the government would review the future siting of infrastructure and homes with climate in mind.
Go Get 'Em, PluggerPlug-in hybrids would reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, says new studyPlug-in hybrid vehicles, long extolled here at Grist HQ, seem always to elicit one question from doubters: Wouldn't running cars on electricity just mean more emissions from power plants? Answer: No! According to a new study from the Electric Power Research Institute and the Natural Resources Defense Council, widespread use of plug-in hybrids -- which can travel up to 40 miles before using any gas, and can exceed 100 miles per gallon -- would significantly reduce U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions, regardless of the energy source. Even if only 20 percent of U.S. drivers owned a plug-in by 2050, says the study, annual emissions would drop by 163 million tons. And if most Americans made the switch, the effect would equal removing about a third of the cars on U.S. roads. The study also dismissed the fear that plug-in technology would overload the grid. In sum: plug-ins -- though unlikely to be commercially available for a few more years, and probably pretty spendy when they do arrive -- are the shiznit.
see also, in Grist: Ford, Southern California Edison partner to test plug-in hybrids
|
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Too, Too Sullied Flesh, 20 Jul 2007
Just When You Thought It Was Safe-ish, 19 Jul 2007
Pretty Please, With Cuomo On Top, 18 Jul 2007
|
|