Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

Orange You Glad We Didn't Say Switchgrass?

Fruit may be the latest source for biofuel madness

Could your kumquat power your Kia? A team of U.S. scientists has made a low-carbon fuel from fructose, the sugar in many fruits. It could be a better bet than ethanol, with 40 percent more energy, less vulnerability to water, and more stability; since it can also be made from plant cellulose, it could also skirt the food-vs.-fuel debate. DMF -- 2,5-dimethylfuran, the result of mixing fructose with salt water, hydrochloric acid, a solvent, and a copper-coated catalyst -- "should be a great fuel," says James Dumesic of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His team has made only small batches, and unknowns abound. But Dumesic says, "We could make this happen [on a large scale] within the next few years if we are told from an environmental safety point of view that this would be a good thing to do. The process ... is very much like a petroleum process, and the knowledge of the petroleum industry in scaling things up could all apply here." Yeah, Big Oil will definitely want to play along with this one.

straight to the source: The Daily Telegraph, Roger Highfield, 21 Jun 2007
straight to the source: IndustryWeek, Agence France-Presse, 21 Jun 2007
straight to the source: BBC News, Matt McGrath, 21 Jun 2007
straight to the source: Scientific American, David Biello, 20 Jun 2007


Comments: (2 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Sugar in my tank?

In that case, Sugar Frosted Flakes could become our next fuel!  First of all, it is not really a food so we are not causing the food shortage that is often a concern.  Second, the marketing is already there: put a tiger in your tank, and so on.  And of course the sugar content would be more than enough for cars, since it surpasses the sugar in apples or oranges.

But I seem to recall that in the old days, enemies would attack by pouring sugar into a gas tank to ruin the fuel lines.  Perhaps we have really progressed to where cars can run on sugar (even though people can not)?  Seriously, I am a little suspicious that this will really work, but am willing to look closer if more details are provided.

David Alexander
PlanetThoughts.org
Love your Planet.

Ethanol fuel

I would like to invite all audience to visit a newly lounched site dedicated to biofuels, ethanol and climate issues. Potential writers are wellcome to write to editors@ethanol-news.de

www.ethanol-news.de

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks