Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Read more about: coal | energy | Florida | mercury | news | all of these topics
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

Glade Runners

Florida utilities commission rejects Everglades-area coal plant

The Florida utilities commission voted unanimously yesterday to reject a proposal for building the nation's largest coal-burning power plant there. The $5.7 billion project, put forth by Florida Power & Light Co., was booted primarily on economic grounds. But since it would have been located near the Everglades, and was all coaly, opponents rejoiced. "The Public Service Commission today made the right decision for the environment, the right decision for the Everglades, and the right decision for Florida," said Gov. Charlie Crist (R). Stephen Smith, head of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, said, "It is time that FPL get serious about investing in energy efficiency and clean energy which will not threaten the future health and safety of their customers." Oh Stephen, you card. FPL protested that pollution controls would have made the facility "one of the cleanest coal plants in the nation." It has five days to ask the commission to reconsider and 30 days to appeal to the state Supreme Court.

straight to the source: South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Ian Katz, 06 Jun 2007
straight to the source: Palm Beach Post, Kristi E. Swartz, 06 Jun 2007
straight to the source: Naples Daily News, 05 Jun 2007


Comments: (1 comment)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Dirty elections & dirty electricity

Can anyone explain why utilities have been so slow to embrace cooperative cogeneration facilities? From my experience living near Melbourne, FLA, it seems there is a standard development unit -  take a few square miles of sacred glades, drain it, build one golf course, one grade school, one WalMart, a library, so many thousand homes, a community building, etc.  If the developers are going to be that blatant about it, the least they could do is install on-site cogeneration, solar heating and cooling, etc.  

As for large utility plants, why site something huge on a site which may well be under water in 50 years,  with increasingly violent hurricane activity, etc.?

Oops, I forgot:  Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris, etc.  Can't expect clean electricity and rational public policy in the state which is poster child for dirty elections.

Stephen Brown Sharon, PA

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks