|
|
||
Wednesday, 28 Mar 2007
It Just Gets In the WayU.S. Interior considering revamp of Endangered Species Act, draft showsLast week, a U.S. Interior Department memo quietly changed where endangered species are protected. Now it seems the feds have been giving the Endangered Species Act an even broader rethink. A leaked draft shows that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has toyed with shifting significant ESA powers to states and allowing activities that imperil species if they don't "hasten the rate of extinction." It may also change the ESA timeframe -- species are now eligible if they face extinction in "the foreseeable future," but that could be cut to 20 years or 10 generations. "It's a radical weakening of the Endangered Species Act," says Daniel Patterson of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, and Kieran Suckling of the Center for Biological Diversity calls it "a rewrite from top to bottom" that "makes recovery of species impossible." While Fish and Wildlife spokesfolks insist plans are still evolving, an anonymous federal employee told Salon that many staffers think the draft is daft.
see also, in Grist: What You Herd Is Not What I Meant
Don't Make Me Pull This Cargill OverAmazon soy export plant shut down in win for environmentalistsGreens did a victory dance this weekend as Brazil forced U.S. agribiz giant Cargill to close a soy export terminal in the country's Amazon region. The facility has long been the focus of a targeted Greenpeace campaign protesting rapid deforestation of the tropical rainforest -- which lost about 6,500 square miles between 2005 and 2006 -- for growing soy, which is then used as cheap feed for future chicken nuggets, wings, and drumsticks. The terminal's closure, which the company plans to appeal, was the result of a court ruling that Cargill had failed to submit a required environmental impact assessment. Said chief prosecutor Felicio Pontes, "Cargill believed that because they were a powerful multinational, they could disrespect both Brazilian legislation and the environment." Though the distribution plant has been involved in a lengthy legal battle, often on the losing end, Friday's decision was the first to actually suspend work. Respect that, soy-suckas.
Sacks EducationSan Francisco approves first-in-nation ban on plastic bagsSan Francisco is the first U.S. city to pass a ban on non-recyclable plastic bags at major supermarkets and drugstores. Once it's signed into law, the stores will have six months to a year to sack the sacks, switching to compostable, recyclable ones made from corn or potato starch -- or reverting to recyclable paper. "We can take steps to make our economy a little more soulful," said lawmaker and ban author Ross Mirkarimi. "Hopefully, other cities and other states will follow suit." Similar bans are in place in South Africa, Taiwan, Bangladesh, and Paris. Noting that his city's businesses hand out 180 million plastic bags a year, Mirkarimi asked, "Why did we have to obligate [stores] to do this? Why didn't they do it voluntarily? It's like waiting for the auto manufacturers to increase gas efficiency." The California Grocers Association raised some half-hearted concerns -- it'll cost more! it'll confuse shoppers! compostable bags suck! -- but all we hear is that Charlie Brown teacher voice. |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
![]() From the Archives
Fuel Me Twice, 27 Mar 2007
Turns Out He Does Know Jack, 26 Mar 2007
Now We Can Watch Them Go Up, 23 Mar 2007
|
|