Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

Sequester Requester

Coal sequestration a near-future necessity; one utility gets a jump start

If coal's going to be viable in an emissions-regulated future, we need to hurry up and learn the how-tos of carbon sequestration, says a new study from MIT. The U.S. should take the lead and fund three to five emissions-burying demo projects within the decade, says the report; meanwhile, companies should be charged for CO2 emissions and incentives for old-school coal plants should be removed. Study coauthor John Deutch drew an analogy between carbon sequestration and nuclear waste disposal, saying, "If you don't pay attention to it at the beginning ... later on it ends up to be a more unpleasant surprise than it has to be." Speaking of surprises, the report indicates that the U.S. Energy Department's "clean coal" research budget "falls far short of what is required." On that note, a big pat on the back to Ohio-based utility American Electric Power, which yesterday announced plans to conduct the nation's largest-ever sequestration project, using a technique on which the DOE has not focused.

straight to the source: Planet Ark, Reuters, Timothy Gardner, 15 Mar 2007
straight to the source: Casper Star-Tribune, Associated Press, H. Josef Hebert, 15 Mar 2007
straight to the source: The New York Times, Matthew L. Wald, 15 Mar 2007
straight to the report: The Future of Coal


Comments: (1 comment)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Sequester Requester

I think sequestration is just a deperate attempt by Big Coal to continue operations.  These are the problems I have with sequestration:

  1.  Wherever you bury it, there is no guarantee it will stay there forever.  After going to the big expense of gasification and sequestration, and it leaks, you are right back where you started.  Coal in the ground is safely sequestered CO2.  Leave it there!

  2.  When the gas leaks, it will not be apparent.  It will be in the form of seepage...seepage with no wind  will kill wildlife and livestock,  seepage into basements or valley communities:  death by suffocation.

Sequestration is a stopgap measure that should be abandoned.  I would be more comfortable with nuclear fission plants that have waste reprocessing facilities along with more solar and wind.  Hydrogen for storage.  Efficiency to reduce demand.

Cheers, Gary Gifford

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks