Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

Capsize Does Matter

Beached British cargo ship leaks oil, shipping containers, motorcycles

A damaged British cargo ship beached off the country's coast is leaking oil, losing containers full of toxic materials, and threatening a World Heritage Site. On a happier note, it's provided a beachcombing bonanza, with items including BMW motorcycles, exhaust system parts, and wine barrels washing ashore. Boggled bobbies are handing out claim forms to scavengers ("Um, fell off the back of a lorry!"), while coast guard authorities work to pump out the more than 3,000 tons of oil that remain in the MSC Napoli's so-far-intact fuel tanks. More than 200 tons of oil has leaked from the engine room, creating a five-mile-long slick and turning seabirds a familiar gooey black; 200 of more than 2,300 containers, including some carrying battery acid, gas, and perfumes, have slid off the wreck's listing deck. "This whole area relies on the beaches for tourism," said a cruise operator. "If you start having these containers thumping around in the shallow water then there's going to be trouble."

straight to the source: BBC News, 22 Jan 2007
straight to the source: The Guardian, Martin Wainwright, 22 Jan 2007
straight to the source: CBS News, Associated Press, 22 Jan 2007
straight to the source: The Telegraph, Paul Eccleston, 22 Jan 2007


Comments: (1 comment)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

oil wreck

Wow!!
Coincidentally, I am just now reading The Outlaw sea, by William Langewiesche, national correspondent for the Atlantic Monthly and have I learned how poorly capitalism works in this (and all) cases!!

The IMO regularlly approves all ships, even the ones that are so dilapidated that they dare not leave the harbor for fear of sinking.  Reading this expose made me aware that double hulled ships are required not for safety, as study after study done shows that the double hull offers no protection in wreck situations, and may increase the rust, trap gas inside the hull, etc.  What the double hull requirement is for, is seems obvious, is to make all ships coming into the land horizon (3 miles) new.  
Since the danger of dilapidated, poorly maintained ships afloat are old (over 20 years), the double-hull requirement serves merely to keep the old ships out.
Once again, the US has crafted a way around the problem it created.  Amazing.

 

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks