Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Read more about: business | climate | news | all of these topics
Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

They Grow Up So Fast

Corporations join green groups to push for U.S. climate action

Quivering under the bed was an option, but 10 major corporations have bravely formed a coalition with four U.S. green groups instead, calling for a national limit on carbon emissions. Their aim is a 10 to 30 percent cut over the next 15 years, using a cap-and-trade system that would allow over-emitters to buy credits from those who fall under the cap. The United States Climate Action Partnership, which wins today's kinda-clever acronym award, includes heavy-hitters like GE, BP, Alcoa, and Duke Energy. Such companies are motivated by fears of a patchwork of state-level regulations, the specter of a fossil-fuel tax, and the unknown predilections of a post-Bush president. Some of the same companies are also part of the new 3C Initiative, a global group looking to Combat Climate Change in the post-Kyoto world of 2013. The ringleader, Swedish utility Vattenfall, claims limiting greenhouse gases could cost 40 percent less than last year's landmark Stern report predicted. Gotta love that bottom line.

straight to the source: The New York Times, Felicity Barringer, 19 Jan 2007
straight to the source: The Washington Post, Reuters, 19 Jan 2007
straight to the source: Financial Times, David Ibison, 18 Jan 2007
straight to the source: GreenBiz.com, 16 Jan 2007
see also, in Gristmill: The 3C Initiative


Comments: (4 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

bravely?

how is supporting a system that allows corporations to pollute to their heart's content brave? the availability of pollution "credits" tells the corporation that it's just great to pollute, as long as they can afford to pay off someone else who isn't using their allotted amounts of pollution.

sounds like a ripe training ground for a new kind of enron to me. all i need to do to get rich is to set up a dummy corporation and fail to pollute. that will leave me plenty of carbon credits to sell to GE or Alcoa.


-- eek

greenwashing

It's just more greenwashing, trying to look good while preserving or increasing the almighty bottom line. I never did understand the idea of pollution credits. The same amount of pollution, just in different places. I know the supposed goal is to reduce overall pollution but it seems like a half-assed way to go about it. And 10 to 30 percent over 15 years? Give me a break! We need much more drastic reductions than that. Now if the reductions were to take place in the next year I'd be happier.

Ditto ditto ditto...

... Greenwashing.  Insufficient cap.  Ripe for abuse.

Why such a circumlocuitous method for reducing emissions? It eliminates the scenario whereby the regulators prioritize, focus on the worst emitters, and order them to clean up their acts.

> They Grow Up So Fast

Cute, slightly irreverent.  If only...

-Neil-

Duke 'em

I fear the greenwashing charge is accurate -- at least for some. Just last week the CEO of Duke Energy was pushing hard for quick approval of a big coal-fire plant (he's also seeking a new nuke plant) "before costs go up". He's putting his money where his mouth is (see the article at http://www.newsobserver.com/685/story/534347.html)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks