Gems Fightin' WordsFederal agency predictions that mines would not pollute water were wrong, study saysBefore giving a precious-metal mine the go-ahead, federal agencies must find that the operation will not taint surrounding waterways with chemicals like arsenic, cadmium, mercury, lead, and cyanide. But for the past 25 years, agencies' pollution predictions "did not generally agree with reality," says Ann Maest, coauthor of a new study by green group Earthworks. The group suggests regulators may rely heavily on the word of industry-hired consultants, rather than past mine experiences and adequate sampling. In response, industry officials suggested that mines that went bust, were abandoned, or weren't built to high environmental standards should not have been included in the study. To which we can only say, "Wha?" And we'll follow that up with a "Whaaa?": Federal regulators have given a mining company permission to dump 4.5 million tons of waste into Alaska's Lower Slate Lake, a move Greg Peck of the U.S. EPA calls "the most environmentally protective way to protect these waters." |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
By Hook and By Crook, 11 Dec 2006
Where We're Going, We Don't Need Science, 08 Dec 2006
Friends in Flow Places, 07 Dec 2006
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.