|
|
||
Wednesday, 06 Dec 2006
Lunguna BeachStudy says California diesel responsible for 1,100 premature deathsOverpopulation plaguing your state? Follow California's lead and kill 'em off! A Union of Concerned Scientists study says diesel emissions from old construction equipment contributed to 1,100 premature deaths and half a million sick days in California in 2005, costing an estimated $9.1 billion. "Construction equipment being used to build our hospitals shouldn't fill them up," says UCS author Don Anair. Unless, of course, it's some sort of state-sanctioned plan. A second study published in Cardiology says people with clogged arteries face a higher risk of heart attack after a day or two of exposure to diesel pollution. Currently, California emissions standards apply to about 30 percent of building equipment; on Monday, the state's Air Resources Board issued draft rules that would require older construction, industrial, and mining equipment to be replaced or retrofit between 2009 and 2020. By which time, the old machines will no doubt have brought population numbers down to a manageable level.We Mine the WorldNuclear-hungry nations eye Africa's uranium depositsIn the 1980s, western nations tried to help Africa by assembling celebs to croon about its woes. Today we see how silly that is, so we're back to extracting resources instead. It's so much more direct, and with energy consumption rising, it will help for a long time! As whispers of a nuclear renaissance grow into a dull roar, for instance, uranium-rich areas are bracing for a boom. Namibia's Roessing Uranium Mine, which opened in 1976 but fell on hard times, is back in full swing. The two-mile-long, nearly-one-mile-wide, over-1,000-foot-deep mine, owned in part by Iran, recently made its first delivery to China. A second mine will open nearby soon, and three others are in the works, pleasing local leaders. But concerned observers aren't convinced. "They cannot tell us that they are safer than before," says Bertchen Kohrs of Earthlife Namibia. "Who says that some day we won't have to take back the nuclear waste here in Namibia?" Oh, Bertchen, relax. Angelina would never let that happen.
Folks, We're Encountering Some TurbulenceE.U. and U.S. at odds over emissions cap for intercontinental flightsIn two weeks, E.U. environment commissioner Stavros Dimas will unveil draft rules for capping airline emissions, and we'll give you one guess who's blocking the runway. At issue is whether to regulate intercontinental flights that use European airports for takeoff or landing, or to just regulate domestic flights; E.U. states want the broader cap, but the U.S. -- fearing increased fares and any chance to look good globally -- says non. "We think this will violate trade rules," said James Connaughton, chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality. "The aviation sector has already made dramatic progress in becoming more fuel efficient because they have to. It costs a lot of money to fly people around." Miffed Europeans say that's bunk. "The U.S. does not have a legal point," says Jos Dings, director of the European Federation for Transport and Environment, who says including intercontinental flights would nearly quadruple the amount of carbon covered by the rules. Nuts, anyone? |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
![]() From the Archives
One Last Stab, 05 Dec 2006
There'll Always Be an England ... in Brazil, 04 Dec 2006
Life's a REACH, and Then You Dye, 01 Dec 2006
|
|