Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

Nothing New Under the Sea

After days of negotiations, U.N. fails to pass high-seas bottom-trawling ban

In a roughy outcome for conservationists, the U.N. failed to adopt a high-seas bottom-trawling ban supported by countries including the U.S. and Australia. The controversial fishing method, currently used by 11 countries including ban-busters Iceland and Russia, involves dragging vast nets and coral-crunching rollers across the sea floor. It has been deemed "highly destructive" and "likely to pose significant risks to [deep-sea] biodiversity, including the risk of species extinction" by the World Conservation Union, and more than 60 conservation groups had spent over two years lobbying for the ban. But the final agreement, reached after days of negotiations, relies on regional fisheries management groups to monitor the practice instead. Such groups oversee a mere 25 percent of the high seas. The new deal "has more loopholes in it than a fisherman's sweater," says Karen Sack, oceans policy adviser for Greenpeace. "It's exactly what states are supposed to be doing anyway. It's nothing new."

straight to the source: CTV, Canadian Press, 25 Nov 2006
straight to the source: BBC News, 24 Nov 2006
straight to the source: The Mercury News, Associated Press, John Heilprin, 24 Nov 2006
straight to the source: Reuters, Irwin Arieff, 23 Nov 2006


Comments: (4 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Bottom trailing

 I have seen documentarys on this subject and people who know say that the ocean is like a liquid desert after one of these nets has gone through.Their meaning is that almost nothing alive the swims is left.Everything is picked up,squid,all fishes,even shellfish.Most of the animals die,because all they want is one type of fish and by the time they dump what they don't want back into the ocean it is dead.This is not a good practice and should be stopped.If we don't set limitations then we will kill the ocean and then,quite seriously,we will die too,really!

Why not ask why!?
Bottom trawling is a huge problem -

it is good to see it being taken seriously, although what has been agreed is clearly insufficient.

The agreement punts the issue to regional fisheries management groups, which exist for about a quart of the world's oceans - these regional groups will likely institute bans, although each group will have to fight the same battle before reaching that decision.

Unfortunately, it leaves to the nations under which bottowm trawlers are flagged the question of what, if any, regulations to impose on bottowm trawling in the open seas.  That, simply, is a race to the bottom.

There are limited numbers of bottom trawlers; the nations that really care about this issue should be figuiring out what unilateral steps they can take to stop the destruction - by declaring the rest of the seas off limits, policing, and coming up with collective reprisal measures (banning landings, imposing tariffs, starting consumer boycotts) that punish the nations and vessels involved.  These will increases the costs to this activity.

Climate Change via Carbon Dioxide?

That the world climate is warming is a given, proven by numerous (private sector)scientists to be a direct function of normal solar cycles.... But the carbon dioxide connection is VERY nebulous.
The issue all the government scientists and media are ignoring is the real danger: Atmospheric Methane, a much bigger danger to life on earth than Co2. As the oceans naturally warm, the decay of Methane Hydrate on the ocean floor adds far more greenhouse effect than does Carbon Dioxide.  That phenomenon is the real cause of the disaperanance of the dinosaurs, let's see them control THAT one.
We are all doomed to roast.. unless the new predictions of a pending global ice age materialize. Who to believe?

Gunny, perhaps repost this in a climate thread?

I think informed opinion is aware that climate change is about much more then CO2, which is really just used as a shorthand for the entire problem.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks