Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.
Daily Grist

Tools: print | email | discuss | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS
Daily Grist

Bluster's Last Stand

DOD declares wind turbines can interfere with radar, but says some can proceed

The Defense Department has finally completed a long-awaited study on how wind farms impact military radar, which clears the way for some stalled wind projects to continue. At least a dozen projects in Illinois, North Dakota, and Wisconsin had been put on hold pending the DOD study. In its report, submitted this week to the Senate and House Armed Services committees, the DOD declared that turbines in radar line of sight can interfere with detecting and tracking aerial objects, but the Pentagon also showed willingness to allow wind projects to proceed anyway if they pass a case-by-case review process. Wind turbines "present technical challenges to the effectiveness of radar systems that must be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis to ensure acceptable military readiness is maintained," the DOD wrote in its report. Wind advocates are hopeful that any conflicts can be resolved. "Decades of experience tell us that wind and radar can coexist," said Randall Swisher of the American Wind Energy Association.

straight to the source: Pioneer Press, Associated Press, John Hartzell, 28 Sep 2006
straight to the source: Peoria Journal Star, Copley News Service, Dori Meinert, 29 Sep 2006
straight to the source: Renewable Energy Access, 29 Sep 2006


Comments: (2 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

love them lobos!

Said the post:
<<
Importantly to the area's ranchers, the rise in wolf population has not corresponded with a rise in the number of livestock killed or injured.
>>

Of course not.  Wolves were never responsible for more than a minuscule percentage of lost livestock.

Anyone who continues to mistrust wolves are alpha lycophobes.  Definitely not an admirable breed.

One thing we need is a bunch of learned wildlife folk, who know wolves well, but also have good people skills, to talk to owners of livestock, from the northern Rockies, across Idaho to Oregon, to assure them that the wolves are not going to be a problem.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Odd

There was no mention of dog and cat waste. I have a friend who has a large dog and his backyard looks and smells like an open sewer. The pollution here in Seattle's streams is most likely from dogs and cats, did they miss something in the other Wahsington?

In the end, it all comes down to biodiversity. Poison Darts--Protecting the biodiversity of our world

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks