Bench WarmersSupreme Court to decide whether EPA should regulate greenhouse gasesThe Supreme Court today announced that it will rule on whether the U.S. EPA should regulate greenhouse-gas emissions from automobiles. Against the advice of the Bush administration, SCOTUS will hear a suit brought by 12 states, a number of cities, and various environmental groups against the EPA. The plaintiffs argue that the agency should classify carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and hydrofluorocarbons -- all planet-warming greenhouse gases -- as pollutants and thus regulate them under the Clean Air Act. A lower court sided with the administration, which argued that voluntary steps to curb the emissions are good enough and that the EPA should not have to "embark on the extraordinarily complex and scientifically uncertain task of addressing the global issue of greenhouse-gas emissions." (So, their argument is ... it's too hard?) The court will begin hearing arguments in October. |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Hey, Poacher, Leave Those Squids Alone, 23 Jun 2006
A Long and Windy Road, 22 Jun 2006
An Irritating Truth, 21 Jun 2006
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.