|
|
||
Wednesday, 22 Jun 2005
Stickin' It to the MandatorySenate passes weak climate amendmentGreens were struck with a severe case of mixed feelings yesterday, as the Senate passed an energy-bill amendment to address global warming (yay!) but passed over a different, tougher amendment (boo!). The latter, sponsored by Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), would have imposed mandatory controls on industrial greenhouse-gas emissions (though it was less ambitious than the McCain-Lieberman plan). Despite the oh-so-scary term "mandatory," Bingaman at one point thought he had the 60 votes to get it through, particularly after powerful Energy Committee Chair Pete Domenici (R-N.M.) expressed support. But a last-minute flurry of lobbying from the White House and the oil and gas industries changed Domenici's mind, Bingaman withdrew the amendment, and lawmakers threw their support instead behind one sponsored by Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.). Hagel's, which passed 66-29, is a cute, cuddly amendment, free of sharp mandatory corners, focusing instead on tax credits and loan guarantees for clean technologies. Fred Krupp of Environmental Defense put his happy face on, hailing the "shift from debating whether we should do something to what we intend to do" about the coming global catastrophe.
see also, in Grist: An interview with Sen. Chuck Hagel about climate change
Hey, Drillers, Leave Our State AloneOil and gas inventory may come soon to a coastline near youThe Senate effectively approved an inventory of oil and gas reserves in U.S. coastal waters yesterday, a move that could help open the door for offshore drilling to begin after a decades-long moratorium expires in 2012. The 52-44 vote defeated an amendment sponsored by Florida Sens. Mel Martinez (R) and Bill Nelson (D) to delete the inventory from the federal energy bill. The vote didn't fall along party lines: Democratic lawmakers from some oil and gas states, like Louisiana's Mary Landrieu, backed the inventory and asserted that more domestic drilling is vital to national security and lower oil prices; Republican legislators from some coastal states countered that the inventory would damage sensitive marine environments crucial to healthy tourism and waste up to $1 billion in taxpayer funds. The vote is a huge defeat for the Florida senators, who thought as late as last week that their amendment had the necessary support. Said Martinez, "Leave our state alone."
A View to a KillingSilicon Valley investors putting big bucks into clean-tech start-upsSilicon Valley's venture capitalists are seeing green in clean energy -- and we're talking gobs of profit, not the whole planet-saving thing. Investor interest in clean-energy tech firms has jumped in the past year, fueled in part by escalating global demand for electricity and the rising price of oil. This month, a consortium of moneybags put $20 million into Nanosolar, a solar energy company based in Palo Alto (gajillionaire Googlemeisters Sergey Brin and Larry Page were early investors). Other California energy innovators are raking in millions in investment funds as well. Total venture capital going into clean tech is still relatively small -- the $520 million invested in 2004 was only 2.6 percent of the total pool of funds -- but trailblazers who have focused on the sector for several years feel validated. "The reason we're allocating dollars to this sector is we think we can deliver attractive returns," says one happy venture capitalist; that it helps the earth is a "great byproduct." |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
![]() From the Archives
We Love to Fly, and It Blows, 21 Jun 2005
Cattle Star Redactica, 20 Jun 2005
Buenos Vistas, 17 Jun 2005
|
|