Eh, Just Throw It Out Back in the ShedNuke industry says cheapest waste-disposal plan is plenty safeWith the Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste disposal facility mired in technical, legal, and political difficulties, nuke boosters have decided, hey, who needs it anyway? "People are no longer saying Yucca Mountain has to be finished in order for the nuclear industry to have a revival in this country," says a spokesflack for Senate Energy Committee Chair Pete Domenici (R-N.M.), and of course by "people" she means, well, the nuclear industry. Industry boosters now say that the waste is safe where it is, in aboveground storage pools at nuclear power plants. This judgment is echoed in a report delivered to Congress by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a summary of a study from the National Academy of Sciences. Mind you, members of the academy involved in the study say that the commission is distorting their findings, and that nobody fully understands the risk of storing nuclear waste in pools. They recommend that the waste be moved to dry storage casks, which would cost the industry a pretty penny but would likely be safer from terrorist attack. |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Oil Together Now, 28 Mar 2005
Conquered in Concord, 25 Mar 2005
Maybe There's Something to This "Polite" Business, 24 Mar 2005
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.