Clear Skies and Present DangerClean Air Act more effective than proposed Clear Skies bill, panel saysA new report by the National Academy of Sciences suggests that the Bush administration's proposed reform of current air-quality standards will effectively do less to reduce pollution than existing Clean Air Act regulations, much as critics, including John Kerry (remember him?), charged during the presidential campaign. The NAS assessment states that the 28-year-old new-source review rules requiring emissions-reducing upgrades in existing power plants is more stringent than the cap-and-trade program proposed in the Clear Skies legislation. Industry groups disagree, as does Will Hart, spokesflack for Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chair James Inhofe (R-Okla.), who says, "It's the same argument we've had before." Exactly. |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Non-Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, 13 Jan 2005
The Fabulous Baker Boy, 12 Jan 2005
Oh You NAS-ty Boys, 11 Jan 2005
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.