Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

It's Us Against Chem

Feds rush to weaken workplace safety rules on toxics before term ends

Posted at 9:10 AM on 23 Jul 2008

The Bush administration is trying to push through a new workplace safety rule to weaken workers' protections against toxic chemicals before Bush's term ends, according to The Washington Post. The rule, which has not been made public, would mandate a reevaluation of the methods used to measure risks to workers from toxic exposure in the workplace. The rule would also require the U.S. Department of Labor to entertain additional challenges to its risk assessments before establishing new limits on exposure to chemicals. So far, work on the proposal has reportedly been fast-tracked and has been conducted largely in secret, drawing sharp criticism from worker advocates. "This is a guarantee to keep any more worker safety regulation from ever coming out of [the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration]," said workplace safety professor David Michaels. "This is being done in secrecy, to be sprung before President Bush leaves office, to cripple the next administration," he said. Once it's published, the rule will be open to public comment for 30 days.

source:  The Washington Post
straight to the proposed rule:  Requirements for DOL Agencies' Assessment of Occupational Health Risks [PDF]

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (3 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

lets take a vote

Lets take a vote grist readers, who is the most evil out of the following?

Satan
George W. Bush
Boris Badenough & Natasha Fatale
Lex Luthor
Magneto

Grist decides 2008!

inhalation of '02

I can't stress enough the need for more strictly enforced rules. To weaken these rules is sentencing  innecent people to a life time ( more brief than normal) of pain, and suffering.
If I were in better health, I would definetly become and advocate for revamped EPA laws.  Make these companies account for their negligence.  How much is a life worth?  Because they are trading a life for weakened, uninforced rules, all for money and all in the name of politics. what a very sad chain of events.  we should be ashamed of ourselves.

I thought OSHA was beyond federal tampering

I am an HR Manager and all that I have read is that OSHA decides what is hazardous or not and write the safety codes accordingly without any other government direction. Wow this is news to me.

I guess if OSHA comes knocking on your door with a potential citing and fining of a company, all that company has to do to get around it is write Bush or the GOP a check and no violation.

Pretty sad that the workers are going to be the ones to suffer.

"For as long as space endures, and for as long as living beings remain, until then may I too abide, to dispel the misery of the world." - Shantideva

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks