|
|
||
If the Leaders Lead, the Lead Standards Will FollowU.S. EPA to tighten standard for airborne leadPosted at 6:24 AM on 02 May 2008Compelled by court order to review its 30-year-old standards for airborne lead, the U.S. EPA proposed a new, tougher standard this week that would cut allowable lead levels by over 90 percent. True to form, though, the agency proposed a range of standards that exceeded the maximum limit of what its scientific advisers recommended as necessary to protect public health. Lead pollution can affect children's development and stunt their IQ; it can also cause heart and kidney problems in adults. In soliciting comments from the public, the EPA went even further, leaving its options open to set still looser lead standards -- up to two and a half times the maximum levels advised by its scientists. The agency also left open the possibility of setting no standard at all, asking for comment on "when, if ever" the airborne lead standard should be scrapped (an option floated by the agency back in 2006). Yet, aside from its flaws, even the upper limits of allowable airborne lead proposed by the agency are a few times stricter than the current standard.sources: The Washington Post, Associated Press, Los Angeles Times, The New York Times |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Mary, Mary, Too Contrary. Bush admin ousts top EPA official over Dow Chemical pollution case.
In Brief. Snippets from the news.
'Bout the Bullet. DOI takes public comment on allowing loaded guns in national parks.
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.