Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

If the Leaders Lead, the Lead Standards Will Follow

U.S. EPA to tighten standard for airborne lead

Posted at 6:24 AM on 02 May 2008

Compelled by court order to review its 30-year-old standards for airborne lead, the U.S. EPA proposed a new, tougher standard this week that would cut allowable lead levels by over 90 percent. True to form, though, the agency proposed a range of standards that exceeded the maximum limit of what its scientific advisers recommended as necessary to protect public health. Lead pollution can affect children's development and stunt their IQ; it can also cause heart and kidney problems in adults. In soliciting comments from the public, the EPA went even further, leaving its options open to set still looser lead standards -- up to two and a half times the maximum levels advised by its scientists. The agency also left open the possibility of setting no standard at all, asking for comment on "when, if ever" the airborne lead standard should be scrapped (an option floated by the agency back in 2006). Yet, aside from its flaws, even the upper limits of allowable airborne lead proposed by the agency are a few times stricter than the current standard.

sources:  The Washington Post, Associated Press, Los Angeles Times, The New York Times

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (8 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Grist In Denial


Looks like business as usual at Grist.

The earth is cooling.

Yet, you plow on as if it were warming!

I guess the science wasn't as "known" as you pretended, Grist Ecologists!

Um?

Did you even read the article? What on earth does global climate change have to do with lead?

If you continue to do what you've always done you'll continue to get what you've always got. - Yogi Berra
Luckily...

...by the time they haveta make a decision on this, a new administration will be in, hopefully one that'll encourage tougher lead standards.

It also helps that lead ins't nearly as "controversial" as other environmental problems in that most people are in agreement on it's effects and the need to eliminate it.

Well, actually....

...EPA is legally bound to make the decision this year.  So it'll still be the Bushies.

Stay tuned.

Great idea

If enough people get high enough lead exposures then  we can hasten our return to the dark ages.

May delay...

...EPA is legally bound to make the decision this year.  So it'll still be the Bushies.

Good point.  But I'm under the impression that they may "delay" it and file it under the "let the next administration handle it" stockpile they seem to be accumulatin' recently.

It's a court-ordered deadline in September


EPA doesn't blow court-ordered deadlines, ever.  It would put the Administrator in contempt of court.  

Court-ordered deadlines happen all the time (when EPA is sued by environmental groups for missing statutory deadlines).  I can't remember EPA ever blowing a court-ordered deadline.  It just doesn't happen.

Bush or ? EPA......

The Bush EPA doesn't care if they must 'protect' the environment now. The costs will be borne by the next (democratic?) administration. So the historical legacy of the Bush administration will look like it was 'efficient', while the next administration (democratic?) will be strapped with the costs & will look 'inefficient'. Yeah, the republicans have been skating on their 'efficient' administrations for decades.    

Your future is not determined by your past

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks