|
|
||
Health BentEPA chemical-review process sucks, says GAOPosted at 1:32 PM on 29 Apr 2008U.S. EPA reviews of the health risks posed by ubiquitous chemicals are hampered by extensive nonscientist involvement, says a report from the Government Accountability Office. The EPA review process, rejiggered by the White House in 2004, is cloaked in secrecy, causes years of delay, and has lost credibility, the GAO says. The Defense Department, Energy Department, and NASA, all of which have a vested interest in potentially toxic chemicals, participate "at almost every step in the assessment process," according to the report. An EPA scientist, speaking anonymously, agrees: "Unless there is concurrence by other agencies ... things don't go forward. The scientists feel as if they have lost complete control of the process, that it's been taken over by the White House and that they're calling the shots." Chemicals that the EPA has yet to determine carcinogen risks for include perchloroethylene, which is widely used in dry cleaning; degreasing agent TCE; and formaldehyde.source: Associated Press see also, in Grist: Over 800 EPA scientists report political interference in their work, survey says |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
May of Reckoning. Polar-bear listing decision must be made by May 15, says judge.
How I Spent My Summer Tax Vacation. McCain, Clinton support summer gas-tax rollback.
In Brief. Snippets from the news.
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.