Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

By Our Power Combined

California utilities scuffle over cap-and-trade

Posted at 8:42 AM on 21 Apr 2008

California is well aware that reducing greenhouse-gas emissions is easier said than done. The state's attempts to craft an effective cap-and-trade system are causing infighting among public utilities and their privately owned counterparts. Public utilities, which source more of their power from coal, protest that they're going to end up paying out the nose to the state and seeing the money redirected into private utilities' coffers. That means public utilities will be lining private utilities' pockets instead of having money available to, say, boost renewable-energy capacity, they argue. But regulators say they don't intend to create a scheme that allows private utilities to profit off of public utilities' misfortune, and that polluters have to get used to the idea of paying for what they spew. "We have to reduce CO2 by 174 million tons by 2020," says California Public Utilities Commission President Michael Peevey. "But no one wants to face up to the cost. Everyone wants everyone else to pay."

source:  Los Angeles Times

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (3 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

"Everyone wants everyone else to pay."

Yeah, and everyone wants everyone else to reduce consumption.  There's no chance of any significant progress here unless everyone is willing to sacrifice something.  Of course, those who consume more must now sacrifice more by making greater reductions in their consumption.

Cap 'n Trade

This is precisely why corporations and politicians prefer C&T to a carbon tax - because the big dogs get to pay the politicians to fiddle the fine print in their favor and hide the costs from the electorate.  A carbon tax (and import tariff) would allow for no such manipulation, and would be hideously obvious.

Cap Without Trade

How did we get stuck with this hideous option to begin with?  (Wait, let me guess, it was the idea of big business.)  What would be best would be caps, with no baloney trading of anything.  Taxes don't work as well, because those who can afford them will still pollute.  That said, a carbon tax with no exceptions would almost certainly work better than this cap and trade garbage.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Job Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcast
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | Weekly Recipes | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2008. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks