Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Put It in Parks

Private land inside national parks under threat of development, report says

Posted at 7:19 AM on 09 Apr 2008

Nearly 2 million acres of private land within the boundaries of U.S. national parks is at risk of being developed if it isn't purchased by the federal government soon, according to a report from the National Parks Conservation Association. Some 4.3 million acres of private land lie within park boundaries, 1.8 million acres of which are considered high priority purchases and could be acquired for a total of about $1.9 billion. The NPCA is calling on Congress and the next U.S. administration to fund the acquisitions before the park service's centennial in 2016 and before the private landowners decide to develop their property. "People who use and visit national parks will be surprised to learn a lot of land within national park boundaries is not protected," said Ron Tipton of the NPCA. "It's not a pretty story that we have park lands that are threatened, for sale and that there is no money to do anything about it."

sources:  Los Angeles Times, The Star-Ledger, Associated Press, National Parks Conservation Association

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (5 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Federal Park land

We don't have money for anything because we are pouring money into Iraq to support George W. Bush and his overgrown ego.

Its all about Commercial exploitation

We just got word today about the same thing happening in the beautiful Daniel Boone National Forest, KY. The Public Comment deadline for this stealth project is THIS FRIDAY! The foxes guarding the henhouse have decided a pine plantation is needed here, a big giveaway to the forest products industry and a poison for habitat preservation. Who could expect more when a timber exec is the Forest supervisor?  

Here's a link for more info:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/boone

click on "planning and projects" and then "project level decisions" then "london" then "london hardwood and pine"

To comment link to:
comments-southern-daniel-boone-london@fs.fed.us

If you want more talking points
 email: kick66org@yahoo.com

For the Forest!

Alright ........ !!!

We can build lots of Starbucks, McDonald's,Kentucky Fried, Holiday Express Inns, and Blockbuster's in the middle of nature ....... those stupid indians didn't know what a gold mine they were sitting on .......

"We Have Found the Enemy and It Is Us" ... Pogo
Its all about Commercial exploitation

Got to agree with that poster's  who wrote "Its all about Commercial exploitation" however in the same respects the NPS, a government agency, is just as bad for  commercializing  their own national parks, in fact these guys are the worst for over developing wilderness areas.
Out this way, they have been trying to develop the Merced River and areas within  Yosemite National  Park and  while a lot of people don't care about they should .
The NPS, that is supposed to protect the environment  has decided to do the opposite  and rebuild what nature has created all in the name of tourism , profit  and  almighty  American dollar.
There have been other  national parks that have had retrofits  usually  funded by   non-profit organizations, that are geared to making your national parks more city rather than wilderness areas and in this case it's the Yosemite Fund who has been pouring money into commercializing Yosemite.

Buy The Inholdings

If eminent domain may be used to take land and give it to private entities, it should certainly be used to take land inside National Parks to give it to everyone and protect the land.  Inholdings in ecologically sensitive areas should be identified, condemned,and taken by eminent domain if the owners refuse to sell.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks