|
|
||
Pros and EconsEPA's economic analysis of climate bill relatively favorablePosted at 6:39 AM on 17 Mar 2008The U.S. EPA has released its economic analysis of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008, concluding that implementing the bill, which includes a carbon cap-and-trade system, would not significantly harm the U.S. economy over the next 20 years. The agency estimated the bill would likely cut U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions 11 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and about 56 percent below by 2050. The EPA also forecast that the U.S. gross domestic product would grow by some 80 percent between 2010 and 2030 under the bill -- only 1 percent below what it would otherwise have been. Critics of climate legislation will likely seize on the EPA's forecast that the Lieberman-Warner bill could increase electricity prices some 44 percent by 2030 and may increase gasoline prices by 53 cents a gallon by 2030. However, environmentalists interpreted the report as confirmation that climate bills can coexist with economic growth, and also stressed that the EPA analysis didn't calculate the economic benefits of reducing emissions.sources: The Wall Street Journal (access ain't free), Environmental Defense Fund, EPA's analysis of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act [PDF] see also, in Gristmill: Bush administration quietly acknowledges climate plan is doable |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Ready to Roan. BLM plows ahead with drilling plans in Colorado.
They'll Never Learn. EPA closure of research libraries was a stupid idea, says GAO.
Diesel Do. EPA announces tough air-pollution standards for shipping industry.
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.