Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Canadians Are So Cute When They're Mad

Canadians fear U.S. energy bill clause could disallow oil-sands exports

Posted at 2:17 PM on 11 Mar 2008

A clause in the recently passed U.S. energy bill could be interpreted to prevent the U.S. from sourcing fuel from Canada's oil sands, putting Canadian officials all in a tizzy. Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act prohibits the U.S. government from purchasing alternative fuels with higher lifecycle greenhouse-gas emissions than conventional petroleum. It's a descriptor that seems to fit oil sands, which have traditionally been classified as an alternative fuel and can produce up to five times more carbon emissions than conventional oil production. But in response to Canada's fears that the rule "could unnecessarily complicate the integrated Canada-U.S. energy relationship," the U.S. government is considering reclassifying oil sands as conventional fuel. Because, really, enabling extra climate-destroying emissions is far preferable to pissing off the Canucks.

sources:  Agence France-Presse, National Post
see also, in Grist:  Canadian federal court ruling could halt planned oil-sands project, Canada oil sands not good for the environment, says study

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (9 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Be nice if it did...

...but they'll just "fudge" the numbers on the GHG life-cycle or contend that it isn't an "alternative" fuel.  One way or another, they'll try and find a way around it.

Makes sense...

...instead of getting oil from a stable republic next door with a resource that will last at least 500 to 1000 years, we should go halfway around the world and import it by ship over the oceans while pouring billions of dollars into a region controlled by terrorists and apostates.

Brilliant.


Canucks

Grist,

Could you be a little more condescending when you speak of Canucks, please? We are so darn cute, we get all in a tizzy when people, especially 'mericans, treat us with too much respect.

Oh, and could you also consider putting out a print publication? As most of us live in igloos, we have no access to Internet. However, we are willing to make the big trudge over to the big communal igloo to pick up our mail, which arrives once a month. If we found some Grist in our mailboxes, we would be just tickled pink.

God save the Queen!
Taimei.

How much we talkin' bout?

Just how much oil does the USA get from Canada anyway?  A couple of barrels here and there?  Cutting off the oil sands won't make that much of a difference.  It's not like we're the USA's #1 source of oil or anything.

Oh, wait a minute...
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publica ...

geobeck

alberta tar sands

When they get done destroying northern Alberta to extract this oil, an area the size of Florida will be a wasteland.
It is currently full speed ahead in the tar sands since global warming does not seem to be a concern for the developers--who happen to hail from all over the planet.
Go to pembinainstitute.org for the complete story.

alberta tar sands

sorry, it's pembina.org


James T. Kirk

is Canadian.  Well, William Shatner is, at least.  And he has always been mighty cute, in one bodily form or another.

And then, there was that positively scrumptious lad who did the red-bloodedly anti-USA Molson's ad, it seems a lifetime ago.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

Canadian Oilsands

Canada is the #1 foreign supplier of crude oil to the U.S.  However, I don't know why Canada is so anxious to maximize crude oil exports to the U.S.  With prices heading inexorably upward, the oilsands resource will be worth far more 5, 10, 25, 50 years from now.  As a proud Canadian, I suggest that we throttle back a tad and pay much more attention to the adverse environmental impact of oilsands projects.

They want the money now...

...they're not willin' to wait that long for it.  And besides, they're afraid of what the market conditions might be 50 years from now...what with Wall Street and all of lower Manhattan literally under water as a possibility, the economic outlook might not be so good.

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks