Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

An Eye for a Buckeye

Dems touch on green issues at debate in crucial primary state of Ohio

Posted at 5:32 AM on 27 Feb 2008

Environmental issues popped up during a discussion of trade policy in last night's debate between Democratic presidential contenders Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Clinton said she would "renegotiate the core labor and environmental standards" of NAFTA. Obama agreed, saying, "I intend to make certain that every [trade] agreement that we sign has the labor standards, the environmental standards, and the safety standards that are going to protect not just workers, but also consumers. We can't have toys with lead paint in them that our children are playing with." Obama and Clinton also agreed on the need to build a green economy. Said Obama, "We have to look at energy and the potential for creating green jobs that can not just save on our energy costs but, more importantly, can create jobs in building windmills that will produce manufacturing jobs here in Ohio, can put rural communities back on their feet by working on alternative fuels, making buildings more energy efficient. We can hire young people who are out of work and put them to work in the trade." Clinton echoed those ideas and cited the example of Germany, which "made a big bet on solar power" and "created several hundred thousand new jobs ... that can't be outsourced."

source:  Debate transcript

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (2 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

Good in theory...

...but standards for labor and the environment through free trade deals are notoriously difficult to enforce in foregin countries.

More Similarities

This shows another similarity between all three candidates.  None of them are calling for a significant reduction in trade, which is what's really needed.  Withdrawal from NAFTA and GATT, and implementing high tariffs in order to strongly encourage buying locally (or at least nationally) would greatly reduce the massive environmental and ecological destruction caused by transportation of good overseas.  While enforcement of environmental standards, if that's even possible, would be a good thing, exceeding U.S. standards is minor compared to the consumption, spilling, refining, and burning of oil, and the extreme noise pollution from ships, all of which are caused by global trade.

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks