Support Grist
Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

In the News

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Comin' Round the Mountain

Leading Dem candidates talk nuclear power at Nevada debate

Posted at 2:18 PM on 16 Jan 2008

The three leading Democratic presidential candidates came together in Nevada last night for yet another debate. Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, and Barack Obama all wooed Nevada voters by voicing opposition to the Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste repository, with Edwards taking his opposition a step further and coming out against all new nuclear construction. The highest drama came before the debate: candidate Dennis Kucinich had been invited to participate, but the invitation was withdrawn after his poor showing in New Hampshire and Iowa. Kucinich sued, a judge found in his favor, and the case was appealed to the state Supreme Court -- which re-excluded Kucinich from the debate just before it was to begin.

sources:  Las Vegas Review-Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post

< Previous | Next >


Comments: (2 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Username: Password:

Forgot your password? Enter your username and click:

The Real Story

Kucinich's exclusion was the biggest story, not just the highest drama.  The three other candidates are all pro-corporate war mongers who, while not being as bad as the totally evil people in the current administration, will do little if anything to put the U.S. on a path away from war and toward proper environmental and ecological behavior.  Dennis Kucinich is the best candidate for the environment and the only Democrat worth supporting as far as I'm concerned, but he's been removed by those who own and run the country.  Debates?  Democracy?  Gimme a break!

now no offense to dennis

but i support john edwards, who i think has a fantastic environmental plan that's great, and he doesn't support new nuclear power.  he's admitted that his vote on yucca was based on info that has since been revealed to be false, much like the iraq vote.  edwards' platform would also move us toward getting rid of nuclear weapons here and abroad.

don't know what to say about the debates.  i suppose edwards supporters are lucky that edwards hasn't been cut out by this point too...

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?


ADVERTISING POLICY


About Grist | Support Grist | Jobs Board | Archives | Grist by Email | RSS | Podcasts
Gristmill Blog | In the News | Ask Umbra® | Muckraker | Victual Reality | 'Tis the Season | The Grist List | The Bottom Line



Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm) ©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.
Webmaster | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Trademarks