Lox and Plan and the Whole Dam Thing

Deal reached to remove Klamath River dams for salmon; obstacles remain

Posted at 6:15 AM on 16 Jan 2008

The Klamath River near the California-Oregon border has been a hotspot in the clash over endangered salmon runs and the irrigation needs of area farmers, but a formal deal reached yesterday suggests a way out of the long-standing disagreements. The plan -- agreed to by a diverse group of stakeholders in the region including Indian tribes, government agencies, farmers, fishers, and a number of conservation groups -- advocates for removal of four dams on the Klamath and outlines clear water-sharing guidelines. It would open up some 300 miles of river that's been inaccessible to imperiled salmon, and restore 60 miles of current reservoir to unblocked river. While the deal is a major development, it still needs approval from several federal agencies and also from the company that owns the dams, the utility PacifiCorp. The plan also hinges on the approval of about $400 million in new funds from Congress. Then there's the small matter of locating another $180 million to actually remove the dams. However, if the deal goes as planned, the dams could be removed as early as 2015.

sources: Associated Press, The New York Times

ADVERTISING POLICY

Comments: (4 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

Wahoo!

This is a major victory for the Earth if it goes through. Many of us have been fighting for the removal of these dam(n)s and water for the rivers themselves for years.

by Wolverine at 1:54 PM on 16 Jan 2008

Spoke Too Soon

Oops. While this deal might be better than the current situation, it apparently still has some major problems, like giving agribusiness priority to divert water over the needs of fish. The Hoopa Valley Tribe of northern California has rejected the agreement and seems to be taking the strongest environmental position. See this article for details: http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/15/18472768.php

Does this remind anyone else of Democrats v. Greens?

by Wolverine at 2:09 PM on 16 Jan 2008

Klamath River: Deal or No Deal?

Friends of the River has been heavily involved in these negotiations for years, and we think this is good but ...

The preliminary agreement announced yesterday is certainly a step in the right direction. But we still have a lot of work left to do. The agreement resolves significant water issues in the Klamath basin and sets up a restoration program to bring salmon back. Despite news reports, though, it doesn't include the removal of PacifiCorp's four outdated, destructive dams on the Klamath River. That will come in a settlement with PacifiCorp.

So Friends of the River, PacifiCorp, California, and everyone else involved in negotiations still has to work hard to save the Klamath.

by tonybogar at 7:05 AM on 17 Jan 2008

Another Rejection

Here's another commenter who rejects this deal.

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/01/21/18473846.php

Overall, I oppose it, despite the fact that it might be slightly better than the current situation. Another problem identified by this commentary is that certain agribusiness interests will be given a waiver from "endangered species laws." Any agreement with a provision like that or like one that would give agriculture priority over fish for use of water should be summarily rejected, and shame on Friends of The River for supporting this agreement.

by Wolverine at 2:17 PM on 21 Jan 2008

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?