|
|
||
Sands Between Your WoesCanada oil sands not good for the environment, says studyPosted at 1:34 PM on 11 Jan 2008To absolutely no one's surprise, Canada's oil-sands operations have been given poor environmental marks in a study by green groups Pembina Institute and the World Wildlife Fund. Ten oil-sands ventures in the province of Alberta, including seven that have not yet started producing, were rated on their pollution of (or potential to pollute) the land, air, and water, as well as their greenhouse-gas emissions and overall environmental management. The top-ranked oil-sands project, Royal Dutch Shell's Muskeg River mine, garnered a score of merely 56 percent; the average score was 33 percent. If each company adopted the best practices of its rivals, the impact would be significant, say the green groups -- especially as Alberta's oil-sands output is expected to triple within a decade.sources: Edmonton Journal, The Canadian Press, Reuters |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
Not in a Bind. Mayoral climate-protecting agreement hasn't necessarily translated into action.
A Perfect Tennesseean. Tennessee Senate passes resolution honoring Al Gore.
Making Change. World's largest banks ranked on their climate commitment.
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.