|
|
||
Bringing Down the GrouseBush admin ignored best science when considering sage grouse species protectionsPosted at 6:23 AM on 05 Dec 2007The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must reconsider its decision not to list the greater sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act, a federal judge ruled this week. The judge said that the FWS ignored the best available science on the species when deciding whether to list it in 2005; he also expressed doubts about the efficacy of the agency's entire decision-making process. The sage grouse decision, he said, was also heavily and improperly influenced by Julie MacDonald, a former political appointee who resigned last May. "Her tactics included everything from editing scientific conclusions to intimidating [FWS] staffers," the judge wrote. "Her extensive involvement in the sage grouse listing decision process taints the ... decision and requires a reconsideration without her involvement." The ruling is a victory for species advocates who have said that all kinds of species and habitat decisions should be reconsidered due to MacDonald's role, not just the seven cases the FWS has said are the only ones in need of review. If ultimately listed under the ESA, the bird's status could slow development, impact grazing rules, and curb rampant oil and gas drilling in parts of the U.S. West.sources: Rocky Mountain News, The Billings Gazette, Associated Press, The Oregonian |
Also in Grist
The Week's Most Popular
From the Archives
On the Bali. Bali conference keeps on keepin' on.
Note to Self: Learn to Swim. Some 150 million people will be at risk from flooding by 2070, says report.
Texas State Pastime: Making Up New State Symbols. Texas mayors want CFL to be state light bulb.
|
|
You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.