They're High, and Dry

News & Analysis
In the News Gristmill Blog Muckraker Features

Columns
Ask Umbra Victual Reality Weekly Recipes The Bottom Line From A to Green The Grist List

Support nonprofit, independent environmental journalism.
Donate to Grist.

ADVERTISING POLICY

[Advanced]

Tools: print | email | write to the editor | subscribe | RSS

Georgia lawmakers propose suspending endangered-species protections during drought

Posted at 1:31 PM on 17 Oct 2007

Lawmakers in Georgia have introduced a bill in the U.S. Congress to suspend Endangered Species Act protections in times of extreme drought, arguing it would help average folks and businesses cope with the serious water woes now plaguing parts of the U.S. Southeast. Georgia's congressional delegation rallied around the proposal, calling it a "common sense" solution to the state's plight. However, if passed, the bill would apply nationwide, allowing states across the country to seek exemptions from the ESA when their governor or the secretary of the army declares that a drought is threatening human health, welfare, and safety.

sources: Associated Press, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

ADVERTISING POLICY

< Previous | Next >

Comments: (4 comments)

You are not logged in. Thus, you cannot post a comment. If you have a Gristmill account, log in below. If you don't have a Gristmill account, well, by all means go make one! Meet you back here in five.

ESA

Imagine that. Each State deciding their own fate. How Constitutional.

Barry

by Yrrab at 3:48 PM on 17 Oct 2007

water wars begin

Except that in 50s, when Lake Lanier was being planned, Florida and Alabama demanded that they get their fare share of the Chatahoochee water. It's believed that the three states signed an agreement on the distribution of the water. In the past 20 years Georgia's widespread rapid development has greatly contributed to this crisis. A federal suit concerning the distribution of this water has been in the courts for years.

'Common sense' would suggest that Georgia should have planned it's growth with limits to water availability in mind.

It'll be interesting to see whether Alabama and Florida think it's common sense to give their water to Georgia.

It's not about water for mussels and sturgeon, it's about development.

by catman at 4:26 AM on 18 Oct 2007

no more flushing?

This is not a good thing. People have a responsibility to be, well, responsible when planning development. It's wrong to essentially consign already stressed and rare species to extinction because humans need water to flush toilets. There has to be some way that we can create closed loop water systems that treat gray water so that it can be used for other purposes rather than putting it down the drain and into the sewers.

by SMLowry at 11:29 AM on 19 Oct 2007

"states' rights" wrong

Barry,
finding the right balance between federal and state governments on what they may and may not regulate has always been tricky. In this case, if your point is that the state of Georgia has the right to abrogate the Endangered Species Act, because it prevents the Georgians from "deciding their own fate," you have got it wrong, just as the Confederacy had got it wrong.

There are certain goods that have a universal character, and that can be said to belong to all humanity, now and into the future, but for the care of which particular local communities are directly responsible. Those communities certainly have the right to provide for their own well-being. But they most certainly do NOT have the right to do that by violating the rights of others, and desecrating their own sacred responsibilities.

Chickens deserve our true friendship! So do fish! So do other sentient beings! Let us learn to be kind.

by caniscandida at 1:11 PM on 19 Oct 2007

The comments of Grist users reflect the opinions of those individuals only, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Grist, its staff, its board members, their psychotherapists, or their aestheticians. Got it?